Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

saturnsring

(1,832 posts)
37. it says this is what the constitution says you can have
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 06:54 PM
Dec 2015

“a good musket or firelock, a sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints, and a knapsack, a pouch, with a box
therein, to contain not less than twenty four cartridges, suited to the bore of his musket or firelock, each cartridge to
contain a proper quantity of powder and ball; or with a good rifle, knapsack, shot-pouch, and powder-horn, twenty
balls suited to the bore of his rifle, and a quarter of a pound of powder; and shall appear so armed, accoutred and
provided, when called out to exercise or into service, except, that when called out on company days to exercise only,
he may appear without a knapsack.”

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The Terrorist Screening Center can place anyone... meaculpa2011 Dec 2015 #1
+1000 nt Mojorabbit Dec 2015 #5
if they arent part of a well regulated militia they arent entitled to guns any way saturnsring Dec 2015 #7
Good to know. When we're you... meaculpa2011 Dec 2015 #9
exactly my point any childkiller "rights" you think you have are a gift from scotus and not from saturnsring Dec 2015 #10
You might want to try ManiacJoe Dec 2015 #22
yea that was hilarious wasnt it saturnsring Dec 2015 #23
Yeah, your posts are hilarious GGJohn Dec 2015 #26
yea murder by gun is hillarious saturnsring Dec 2015 #29
Not what I said, GGJohn Dec 2015 #31
The SCOTUS, Pres. Obama and the Democrat Party disagree with you. eom. GGJohn Dec 2015 #11
for now saturnsring Dec 2015 #12
For good. GGJohn Dec 2015 #13
the latest sacrifice to the 2a saturnsring Dec 2015 #14
Wow, the emotional card when you can't refute facts. eom. GGJohn Dec 2015 #17
there were no facts tio refute. but i can give you one saturnsring Dec 2015 #19
Again the emotional card. GGJohn Dec 2015 #20
you label it whatever you want so you can dismiss it but is a fact, anyone at anytime can saturnsring Dec 2015 #21
+1000 smirkymonkey Dec 2015 #24
And yet 99.9% of firearm owners don't fall anywhere in your little fantasy. eom. GGJohn Dec 2015 #28
youre correct and the dont until they do - they get depressed and disgruntled or they suddenly saturnsring Dec 2015 #39
An as yet unmanifested future state can not be called a fact sanatanadharma Dec 2015 #41
That those people are dead because of guns hifiguy Dec 2015 #32
No, those people are dead because of a criminal, GGJohn Dec 2015 #34
Welcome to my ignore list. hifiguy Dec 2015 #35
Proud to be there. GGJohn Dec 2015 #36
a criminal with a gun saturnsring Dec 2015 #40
It's Democratic party ProudToBeBlueInRhody Dec 2015 #42
Pray tell, what slip? GGJohn Dec 2015 #44
Except the whole being in "The Bill of Rights" EX500rider Dec 2015 #33
it says this is what the constitution says you can have saturnsring Dec 2015 #37
besides the militia clause refers to a militia not to any joe-blow looking for a gun to kill his ex- saturnsring Dec 2015 #38
Fear of armed muslim terrorists keeps armed christian terrorists buying more - blm Dec 2015 #2
What other civil rights do you support removing with no due process just because someone puts you Lee-Lee Dec 2015 #3
Fuck. The. NRA. Initech Dec 2015 #4
Fuck due process of law too, right linuxman Dec 2015 #15
And every single horse they rode in on. Iggo Dec 2015 #16
Hear, hear! smirkymonkey Dec 2015 #25
The reason this terror watch list is dismissed by many is that because Ted Kennedy was on it at one Waldorf Dec 2015 #6
Senator Kennedy was not on the no-fly list. ManiacJoe Dec 2015 #27
Well now we know who runs things in the GOP. Rex Dec 2015 #8
Anyone know how the ACLU feels about the terror watch list? Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #18
They oppose both the Terror Watch list and the No Fly list. eom. GGJohn Dec 2015 #30
They are not a fan. Dr. Strange Dec 2015 #43
If a quarter of that 875,000 were tarists, we would be in trouble. Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NRA Ordered GOP To Allow ...»Reply #37