Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to LynneSin (Original post)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No, they aren't a terrorist NobodyHere Dec 2015 #1
How so? LynneSin Dec 2015 #2
Are you serious? linuxman Dec 2015 #4
It's a matter of intent, not effect Xipe Totec Dec 2015 #6
And yet, that's still not terrorism linuxman Dec 2015 #7
Definition of Terrorism Xipe Totec Dec 2015 #8
I never said there was a binding consensus. linuxman Dec 2015 #9
... Xipe Totec Dec 2015 #10
Cute cartoon. linuxman Dec 2015 #11
Out of curiosity... deathrind Dec 2015 #14
Depends. linuxman Dec 2015 #15
Fair enough. deathrind Dec 2015 #16
I should have clarified. linuxman Dec 2015 #17
Could not agree more... deathrind Dec 2015 #3
And that's the rub. linuxman Dec 2015 #5
Which is why I disagree with the OP. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2015 #19
I go the other way. If the intent is to kill as many as possible, they are mass murderers. morningfog Dec 2015 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Dec 2015 #13
I'd like to think most combat soldiers intent is not to kill everyone in sight LynneSin Dec 2015 #21
Strongly disagree. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2015 #18
Way TOO MUCH killing lately... A1an Dec 2015 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the intent of a person...»Reply #13