Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Second Amendment must go: We ban lawn darts. It’s time to ban guns [View all]You want guns to magically disappear without providing a viable non-lethal replacement.
Why are you so opposed to the idea when the end result would be less guns? Isn't that what you want?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Second Amendment must go: We ban lawn darts. It’s time to ban guns [View all]
Photographer
Dec 2015
OP
Unless you've been living in a cave for the past 30 years, you can't buy them anymore.
Photographer
Dec 2015
#6
Gunners will be here to tell us it can't happen, their sick fondness for lethal weapons
Hoyt
Dec 2015
#4
^ Spoken like someone who values guns more than the lives of their fellow Americans
LonePirate
Dec 2015
#14
Are you suggesting then that you're hoping for some dictatorial edict that will make right
jonno99
Dec 2015
#34
There is no sufficient alternative to repealing the 2A, banning and confiscating all guns.
LonePirate
Dec 2015
#37
Well, see there I believe you are wrong. According to Bernie even, the vast majority of gun owners
jonno99
Dec 2015
#42
Why is your addiction to guns more important than thousands of lost lives every year?
LonePirate
Dec 2015
#15
"(A)ddiction to guns"? Are you a licensed telepsychologist, or merely playing one on the net?
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2015
#18
Until you gunbers start to value human lives more than guns, you're in no position to criticize.
LonePirate
Dec 2015
#24
I don't own a gun, so your remote sensing is on a par with your remote psychology
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2015
#29
Very little difference between a gunner and someone who merely supports them.
LonePirate
Dec 2015
#31
Your claims to moral superiority have so far been made without evidence
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2015
#33
I am no ones' moral superior- and neither are you. The Second Amendment is yours to repeal
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2015
#48
Holy shit! It sounds as if you must have to protect yourself from violence on a nearly daily basis!
Photographer
Dec 2015
#16
As well as you seem to assume. I can only infer that your fear of bad people with you in their
Photographer
Dec 2015
#21
But did you have a fire extinguisher handy? If so, I must infer that you fear fire constantly.
X_Digger
Dec 2015
#25
I did. Not enough. First home fire for me and while I still have dreams about it I don't sleep wit
Photographer
Dec 2015
#27
I wouldn't be surprised. They've turned paranoia and fear into an art forms.
Photographer
Dec 2015
#47
Try this on for size: If there weren't so many lethal weapons out there, there woul be less reason
Photographer
Dec 2015
#28
Not at all. I edited that out because she found it offensive but I own it.
Photographer
Dec 2015
#38
So I take it you've had a lot of problems with people firing at you in churches, theaters and clinic
Photographer
Dec 2015
#51
The problem is not guns but the violent dialog promoted by conservative radio and conservatiave
Todays_Illusion
Dec 2015
#63
You need the votes of two thirds of Congress and three fourths of the state legislatures.
DemocratSinceBirth
Dec 2015
#72