Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Notice anything? [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)46. To those not interested in looking at objective facts perhaps.
A population density map would look exactly like the one you presented.
So what?
So while living a mile away from your nearest neighbor might make you safer from gun violence purely by virtue of geography, that fact just isn't that relevant towards gun policy unless the solution is to get people to live farther away from each other.
The map I posted serves to identify both the location of the problem, and the magnitude of the problem, as opposed to projecting a misleading pretense that certain low population states have as much of a gun misuse problem as states like CA or Ill, which is exactly what the 'rate' maps do.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The San Bernardino shooting, Sandy Hook and Aurora theater shooting all happened in blue states?
Brickbat
Dec 2015
#4
Splashy, but tiny points of sensationalism in a nation awash in gun deaths.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Dec 2015
#26
I hate to help the gun nuts out but this seems to show firearm deaths, not just shootings.
Gidney N Cloyd
Dec 2015
#10
What's bullshit is blaming an object instead doing something about the underlying causes
Lurks Often
Dec 2015
#42