Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jim Beard

(2,535 posts)
190. Very good, I had to go to the you Tube link and "steal" it for myself.
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 05:55 PM
Dec 2015

here is another one...You Tube of hunters and gun instructors]



Hope you enjoy

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That would be a good start bowens43 Dec 2015 #1
Here's a better start. RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #108
Good thought. treestar Dec 2015 #114
and video games mwrguy Dec 2015 #133
Brilliant idea! smirkymonkey Dec 2015 #154
You really want to take toy guns out of toy stores TeddyR Dec 2015 #166
This works in Europe RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #173
Very good Idea Jim Beard Dec 2015 #185
We need sensible thinking, NRA does not provide a base of sensuble thinking. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #2
Well, "somebody" must care ... JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2015 #3
the machine gun ban dates from the 1920's or 1930's dsc Dec 2015 #183
Not that much improvement. Same basic designs, shapes, and caliber selection. Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #189
If you're going to start trying to ban things pintobean Dec 2015 #4
No, I think my reps and senators get the idea. boston bean Dec 2015 #5
except they do not either Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #10
We should depend on the terrorist organization of the NRA to write these things, heh? boston bean Dec 2015 #11
No, we shouldn't, GGJohn Dec 2015 #27
I dont need to know what makes a car work, I just want to drive it. Jim Beard Dec 2015 #186
But if you're a law maker pondering new laws on firearms, GGJohn Dec 2015 #188
So they all need to know about the parts of a nuclrar weapon to vote for a a reduction treaty. Jim Beard Dec 2015 #193
Well, apparently, those aides aren't doing there jobs, GGJohn Dec 2015 #194
legislators Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #29
Lol. So it doesn't really matter what we're talking about pintobean Dec 2015 #16
Why don't you type it out. You are so interested in the correct vernacular, you could be an expert. boston bean Dec 2015 #19
I'm not trying to ban anything pintobean Dec 2015 #22
Goodie for you. Either get the point/or not, vernacular derailments boston bean Dec 2015 #24
It's what you're whining about. pintobean Dec 2015 #28
Yet, you offer nothing. Except pointing out boston bean Dec 2015 #32
I think you are right. Christ, there are people... actslikeacarrot Dec 2015 #145
Most of our Reps have no fucking clue about firearms. GGJohn Dec 2015 #18
Wow. Good to know. I just ran out of... meaculpa2011 Dec 2015 #36
Hilarious ain't it. GGJohn Dec 2015 #38
Really, what is it with your gun obsession? smirkymonkey Dec 2015 #155
Ok, here's my answer. GGJohn Dec 2015 #159
OK. Thanks for the explanation. smirkymonkey Dec 2015 #160
No problem. GGJohn Dec 2015 #161
No problem! smirkymonkey Dec 2015 #162
No, they are rather incompetent on bans... Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #187
Nice hijack Renew Deal Dec 2015 #34
He does it every time guns come up here. lark Dec 2015 #81
Thats not 'shooting holes' in the details. beevul Dec 2015 #164
They sure left out a lot of details when they wrote safeinOhio Dec 2015 #40
If all the dead can raise their hands we will go with your proper language proposal. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2015 #87
An answer? Photographer Dec 2015 #6
eh! good one! make the point perfectly. boston bean Dec 2015 #14
that should only Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #15
I thought we just went over this? Photographer Dec 2015 #17
here? Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #30
+1,000,000 lark Dec 2015 #82
Very good, I had to go to the you Tube link and "steal" it for myself. Jim Beard Dec 2015 #190
Hey, if you can't describe the inherent benefits of 1:10 rifling in a .308 barrel ... Scuba Dec 2015 #7
Wrong. Straw Man Dec 2015 #148
One needn't be a neurotoxin specialist to know ... Scuba Dec 2015 #167
Neurotoxins? Straw Man Dec 2015 #169
NO. GGJohn Dec 2015 #8
There will be a tipping point, and your minority of block voters en masse boston bean Dec 2015 #9
Been hearing that for the last 30 years GGJohn Dec 2015 #23
We're getting closer cause the further that pendulum swings into boston bean Dec 2015 #26
We're getting closer? GGJohn Dec 2015 #35
Yes, you just haven't felt it yet. I wouldn't be so sure if I were you. boston bean Dec 2015 #37
How do you know I haven't been affected by firearm violence? GGJohn Dec 2015 #41
When did I intimate any such thing? boston bean Dec 2015 #44
They are a miniscule part of the problem GGJohn Dec 2015 #46
They are the weapon of choice for mass murderers and are easily available. boston bean Dec 2015 #48
Well luckily for us, GGJohn Dec 2015 #52
They are the implement used to KILL innocent people. boston bean Dec 2015 #55
One more time, GGJohn Dec 2015 #58
Your firearms haven't hurt anyone. Yet your position and fight to boston bean Dec 2015 #59
My fight isn't really about the availability of firearms., GGJohn Dec 2015 #61
And in doing so is part of the problem we face today. boston bean Dec 2015 #62
I advocate for freedom of choice and I'm the one being selfish? GGJohn Dec 2015 #63
There are many products that are not safe for society that have been banned, recalled. boston bean Dec 2015 #65
Those products weren't protected under the Constitution. GGJohn Dec 2015 #66
Neither are all types of gun ownership protected under the constitution. boston bean Dec 2015 #68
The words in general use mean anything to you? GGJohn Dec 2015 #69
This will change, and it will be despite persons like yourself. Sorry to say. boston bean Dec 2015 #71
The SCOTUS is loath to overturn settled law, GGJohn Dec 2015 #73
The supreme court can and will bend to this national crisis. boston bean Dec 2015 #74
The SCOTUS doesn't interpret the Constitution according to the will of the people GGJohn Dec 2015 #77
I believe the constitution is a living breathing document, like most people boston bean Dec 2015 #78
Of course it is, I never said different, GGJohn Dec 2015 #79
They shall when we have the right mix of justices. boston bean Dec 2015 #80
Sticking your fingers in your ears and saying LALALALALALA GGJohn Dec 2015 #83
and right back at you. I believe that this country will one day soon boston bean Dec 2015 #84
Here ya go Boston Bean Jim Beard Dec 2015 #195
Wanting to ban self loading firearms is not "reasonable". beevul Dec 2015 #165
Why do you need a semi automatic ? treestar Dec 2015 #115
I own and live on a small farm, we have lots of predators that try to take our livestock, GGJohn Dec 2015 #119
great thing about the AR platform Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #125
for hunting deer and elk treestar Dec 2015 #139
what's not ordinary Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #144
Several reasons hack89 Dec 2015 #146
It's much lighter than the standard bolt action hunting rifle with all the wood furniture on it, GGJohn Dec 2015 #149
What makes the AR15/AR10 platform quite popular is the ability to push to pins, pop out the current Waldorf Dec 2015 #150
The only semiautomatics I own... (this ended up being a long post...fair warning!) Lizzie Poppet Dec 2015 #129
nice rant, thanks Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #147
Having cases of MRE's is also a prudent move, GGJohn Dec 2015 #153
Yep. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2015 #156
Not a ban, but just safeinOhio Dec 2015 #45
I would have no problem with opening up the NFA to include semi auto rifles GGJohn Dec 2015 #47
Sure, add to that safeinOhio Dec 2015 #51
Agreed. eom. GGJohn Dec 2015 #53
"yet, firearm laws are getting more liberal each year. " Springslips Dec 2015 #43
Are there any restrictions you'd support? lark Dec 2015 #91
I would like to see the NFA reopened and semi auto rifles classified as NFA titled weapons, GGJohn Dec 2015 #94
Ha, the law does't say anything about citizenship. lark Dec 2015 #104
Not for much longer. smirkymonkey Dec 2015 #134
It doesn't matter what anyone wants or how many supports pipoman Dec 2015 #25
All it took was a Supreme Court decision to get us to where we are now. -none Dec 2015 #70
Apparently you don't understand how the SCOTUS works, GGJohn Dec 2015 #72
Appearently it is you that does not understand a few things here. -none Dec 2015 #90
Apples v Oranges. GGJohn Dec 2015 #92
It will take a hundred fucking years. . you do know this right? pipoman Dec 2015 #99
The states are doing the same with guns yeoman6987 Dec 2015 #121
Actually, Chicago gun laws are now the same as all of Illinois State Pre-emption applies DonP Dec 2015 #157
VRA was settled Supreme Court law and it was over-turned. lark Dec 2015 #98
Neither will happen in your lifetime....what will you do today? pipoman Dec 2015 #101
As I said, very rarely does the SC overturn themselves. eom. GGJohn Dec 2015 #103
But, it does happen. lark Dec 2015 #105
Yes, it does happen on a rare occasion. GGJohn Dec 2015 #107
In today's messed up rw world, I don't trust the SCOTUS to do anything right. lark Dec 2015 #116
"Get us where we are?" SCOTUS merely affirmed where we have been for years. Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #191
The union will dissolve long before that happens. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2015 #112
The last major overhaul on gun control was by president Clinton in 1994 yeoman6987 Dec 2015 #118
En masse? Well, that explains the glut of teabaggers and republicans in congress. Photographer Dec 2015 #13
Yeah, who cares that millions are killed? lark Dec 2015 #85
No, what counts that law abiding citizens have the right to make the choice of what's best for GGJohn Dec 2015 #88
Freedom to live is more important. lark Dec 2015 #93
My firearms in no way is the problem, they've never been used in any criminal manner GGJohn Dec 2015 #96
"who cares that millions are killed?" EX500rider Dec 2015 #168
Why ? treestar Dec 2015 #113
Would that include handguns as well? Elmergantry Dec 2015 #12
Airplane crash? Aerospace community: how can we make these safer? Mass shooting? Gun community: crickets. lostnfound Dec 2015 #20
You just don't like what you hear pipoman Dec 2015 #31
We all know that NRA propganda has worked, and it's worked well. baldguy Dec 2015 #50
The only real threat the NRA has is, 'we will sue and win on constitutional grounds'... pipoman Dec 2015 #64
I like those solutions just fine but I don't see the gun community exactly aligned on them lostnfound Dec 2015 #135
No, the issue is that those most concerned waste their time on constitutional impossibilities... pipoman Dec 2015 #138
The gun community owns this problem. Why doesn't "those most concerned" include the gun community? lostnfound Dec 2015 #170
No, I see plenty of suggestions from liberal 2nd advocates pipoman Dec 2015 #171
What about the backlash against smart guns that only fire when in one's own hands... lostnfound Dec 2015 #174
There isn't a single good option available.... pipoman Dec 2015 #176
allow them to be sold Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #177
Saw an editorial treestar Dec 2015 #163
Since that isn't going to happen.... pipoman Dec 2015 #21
Farook passed a background check Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #39
Do you realize pipoman Dec 2015 #57
yes best to do nothing because anything we do will not be perfect. Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #76
The San Bernadino terrorists had a garage bomb factory. Hangingon Dec 2015 #95
technical derailment diversion. Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #128
Okay. I'll just wait and see. Hangingon Dec 2015 #152
We'll have to take it up with the NBA: National Bomb Association. Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #192
Why don't you care that 100k felons, crazys, and domestic abusers are ignored? pipoman Dec 2015 #131
Their internet playbook puts the "technical derailment" Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #33
Someone has to know the terminology TNLiberal4 Dec 2015 #42
absolutlely Locrian Dec 2015 #54
True. That's why no one but doctors can discuss laws about medical practices and products. And Squinch Dec 2015 #151
Discussion is great TNLiberal4 Dec 2015 #175
Bernie Sanders is not a financial industry insider. Do you think he is capable of putting Squinch Dec 2015 #184
This law has stood the test of time safeinOhio Dec 2015 #49
problem is fully auto Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #60
Opium poppies were a widely grown garden flower too jberryhill Dec 2015 #97
and I am for cannabis legalization Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #102
So am I, but that's not the point jberryhill Dec 2015 #122
and weapons are heavily Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #124
Clearly not enough jberryhill Dec 2015 #140
clearly need to be enforced Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #143
You could buy one from the Sears catalog at the time safeinOhio Dec 2015 #132
yes but most did not Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #136
No, I do not believe that edgineered Dec 2015 #56
An argument for a lack of critical thinking when proposing gun bans? aikoaiko Dec 2015 #67
"You can't have this, you can't say that, you can't go there, you can't do that." Jester Messiah Dec 2015 #75
I'm not sure if they think we/people are stupid G_j Dec 2015 #86
Ban pressure cookers shadowrider Dec 2015 #89
Pressure cookers have a use other than killing Renew Deal Dec 2015 #109
So pressure cookers used as bombs are ok, since they have more than one use? shadowrider Dec 2015 #111
That is their way of derailing any discussion on gun control. Trying to turn it into a technical stevenleser Dec 2015 #100
You think this is a discussion about gun control? cherokeeprogressive Dec 2015 #123
not gun control at all Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #126
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #106
This Citizen Suspects That Appeals To Reason Will Not Persuade - Certainly The NRA Agrees cantbeserious Dec 2015 #110
I'd like to go on record... Lizzie Poppet Dec 2015 #117
Yawn cherokeeprogressive Dec 2015 #120
. Facility Inspector Dec 2015 #127
as if people don't recognize all the NRA talking points G_j Dec 2015 #130
How about we de-glamorize them? Igel Dec 2015 #137
Then you will need to ban everything except single shot weapons. A revolver can be fired as fast Waldorf Dec 2015 #141
Mine are made for saving lives... ileus Dec 2015 #142
The fact that firearms can be used for legitimate self defense and often are ... spin Dec 2015 #182
Another stupid EMOTIONAL OP that gets no conversation going nadinbrzezinski Dec 2015 #158
Stupid, no. Ignorant, yes. ManiacJoe Dec 2015 #172
I disagree and that is because I watch sausage making for real nadinbrzezinski Dec 2015 #178
Actually, you seem to be in very much agreement with me. ManiacJoe Dec 2015 #179
Where I disagree is that people should not be stuck on lingo nadinbrzezinski Dec 2015 #180
You still seem to be agreeing with me. ManiacJoe Dec 2015 #181
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do gunners think people a...»Reply #190