General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Republicans Allow Potential Terrorist Buy Guns Legally?!?! [View all]CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)I'm assuming here that it was there all along and you didn't add it after the fact. Nah, Isee no evidence of that and surely you don't win an argument that bad.
However, it is interesting that when you couldn't come up with a good reply to my post on your own, you had to go find someone else's thoughts to try to win the argument. Hey, I understand that it was difficult to argue that you are taking a "progressive position" when every progressive is voting against your position and and every conservative is voting for it.
That's hard argument to over come - you obviously couldn't so you resorted weasel tactics - that's my definition for trying to shift the subject of the argument when you know you're losing. It's done all of the time on DU.
What I find really fascinating that your weasel attack my argument consisted of saying I was using "authorities" to make my point. But you couldn't. or at least didn't make that argument on your own. What you did was rely on an "authoritative" website to make your argument for you. Didn't your just do what you accused me of doing - using an authority to make your point? That's rich - the pot calling the kettle black.
And by way, apparently your little gunny sidekick apparently don't think you can win a debate on your own so they try to pitch in from the sidelines. Why don't you tell them that you are a big boy and you will call them in only if you are losing real bad.