Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(21,786 posts)

2. Implementing laws by local jurisdiction is the same as saying "we shouldn't have any"

Wed Dec 9, 2015, 02:27 AM

Dec 2015

since there's not really very much to stop someone from going to the next county to buy weapons and ammunition, is there?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Gun control laws should be city / county implemented not state or federal implemented [View all] AZ Progressive Dec 2015 OP

scotus lancer78 Dec 2015 #1

great point. safeinOhio Dec 2015 #3

Are you in favor of border controls between jurisdictions? baldguy Dec 2015 #4

No, it shouldn't. GGJohn Dec 2015 #6