Insurance companies don't like gold and platinum plans [View all]
http://khn.org/news/cigna-ceo-david-cordani-aca-marketplace-is-still-in-version-1-0/
What we know is if [a patient is] asthmatic and more actively managed, the health outcomes and therefore the affordability can be quite different. This is a case where if you have a chronic illness, you need to be in a management program.
Question: What is Cignas concern with gold products?
Adverse selection. [Its not that policyholders] are necessarily older or sicker. The whole way the benefits are configured and the way marketplace is working the performance of those plans is much less reasonable than all the other plans. Either there will be more flexibility to configure them in a way to make them sustainable or there wont be gold plans.
Comment by Don McCanne of PNHP: Skimming through the comments of Cigna CEO David Cordani, it comes as no surprise that, with the Anthem/Cigna merger (approved by the shareholders last week), plans are being laid to enhance the business advantages of the corporation to the detriment of the plan participants.
Squeezing enrollment (favoring the healthy), reconfiguring provider networks (impairing access for the sick), reducing spending on Medi/Medi dual-eligibles, selling more patient management programs, and using benefit design to fragment risk pools are the types of policies that we have come to expect from the private insurers. Works well for them.
In this interview, there are a couple of points that demonstrate the problem described in yesterdays Quote of the Day on information frictions and how they impact adverse selection (concentrating high-risk individuals in a single plan).
The more information the purchaser of an insurance plan has, the much greater is the possibility that it will lead to adverse selection.
Cordani says that the market must have a focus on transparency for consumers. With greater transparency, patients with high health care needs will select plans that have the greatest actuarial value - plans that pay the highest percentage of the health care costs. In the exchanges, those are the gold plans. They pay 80 percent of the costs, as opposed to 60 or 70 percent for the bronze and silver plans respectively.
As we learned yesterday, it is essential to have effective risk-adjustment transfers to correct for adverse selection that results from patients understanding the benefits of the plans that they purchase. Well informed, high-risk patients will be concentrated in the gold plans, but since we do not have tools that adjust risk adequately, the insurers will be exposed to the greater risk of adverse selection impacting the gold plans.
So what is Cordanis solution? Either provide more flexibility to configure them in a way to make them sustainable, or eliminate them.
Configuring them to make them sustainable is, of course, code language for screwing up the benefits so they it becomes more difficult for patients to access the care that they need. If they cant screw them up enough, then just get rid of them.
Yesterdays message on information frictions was a challenging read, but it does show that academics with a heart, such as Benjamin Handel and his colleagues, do have something to offer the policy community. Those who might be interested but passed over yesterdays message because of its complexity may want to take another stab at reading it. Its an important concept to understand. It is posted at:
http://www.pnhp.org/news/2015/december/information-frictions-good-for-insurers-bad-for-patients