Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)

6. No, it shouldn't.

Reply to AZ Progressive (Original post)

Wed Dec 9, 2015, 08:51 AM

Dec 2015

Most states have a pre emption law just because a firearm shouldn't have to worry about being legal from city to city, town to town, county to county.
Only the state should be setting firearm laws so there isn't a patchwork of laws throughout the state.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Gun control laws should be city / county implemented not state or federal implemented [View all] AZ Progressive Dec 2015 OP

scotus lancer78 Dec 2015 #1

Implementing laws by local jurisdiction is the same as saying "we shouldn't have any" Spider Jerusalem Dec 2015 #2

great point. safeinOhio Dec 2015 #3

But, of course, gun regulation isn't always about buying the firearm or ammunition HereSince1628 Dec 2015 #5

Are you in favor of border controls between jurisdictions? baldguy Dec 2015 #4

No, it shouldn't. GGJohn Dec 2015 #6

Abortion laws should be city / county implemented not state or federal implemented hack89 Dec 2015 #7