General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I hope we have a lot of trolls here at DU. [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)If he really did, he'd have a more competent staff.
He wants to make a few points, is all.
All that "In it to win it" stuff was just for show.
I think our best years are in front of us and I think Hillary Clinton has, as a goal, the view that she will be leaving us with a better and safer world. I don't think she is a sociopath or evil, I think she, like many people I know, have at their core the concept of SERVICE to people, to our country, to the betterment of the world.
If she were really interested in the whole Greed is Good thing, she wouldn't keep plowing money into that foundation that does "terrible" things like eradicate disease and bring clean drinking water to people in dire need. She'd buy stocks in Silicon Valley corporations and other Big Stinky Money enterprises, and ride around from place to place in a golden Mercedes, partying and drinking mimosas, or something.
The characterization of her as someone other than a person who is interested in serving her nation and helping people is a bit shopworn. No one with an iota of fairness believes it.
Hope springs eternal for me and people like me. We like to make things better, not complain relentlessly about how everything sucks. A culture of negativity just doesn't resonate with me. HRC has that positive, can-do attitude, and it resonates. It's part of the reason why she will prevail.