Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2naSalit

(103,809 posts)
14. I agree.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 01:15 PM
Dec 2015

Worked with oils once upon a time and there is a process in creating the overall image that has to be built upon which can involved removal or covering an element in the picture. There is also a part of the process where guidelines are drawn in by various means as placeholders... that's where I suspect this underneath image came from. The fact that it took so many years to complete this project, I can imagine that this was the "placeholder image" for some time.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The problem here is he is a scientist,not an artist edhopper Dec 2015 #1
That makes sense, ed. ananda Dec 2015 #2
It is interesting edhopper Dec 2015 #3
Layperson here, but I was thinking it is the KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #10
Painters will scrape off parts as the work edhopper Dec 2015 #13
I agree. 2naSalit Dec 2015 #14
No secret coded messages or math equations?? Blue_Tires Dec 2015 #4
"Be sure to drink your Ovaltine" pinboy3niner Dec 2015 #5
brilliant... Blue_Tires Dec 2015 #6
They did the same with a Trump image. trumad Dec 2015 #7
An earlier "layer" of a photoshop rendition of Trump here... cascadiance Dec 2015 #8
LOL'd! Stardust Dec 2015 #12
Mona lets her hair down LOL nt Javaman Dec 2015 #9
The technology they are using for this exploration is amazing csziggy Dec 2015 #11
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hidden Portrait Found Und...»Reply #14