Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(26,696 posts)

3. Interesting. Previous articles made it sound like just the

Fri Dec 11, 2015, 01:25 PM

Dec 2015

'no-fly' list, but this one says it's the much broader watchlist - an even bigger misstep, I'd say.

I've posted my opposition to using these lists to deny citizens and residents their civil rights/liberties, but here are a couple of DU thread linking well-articulated arguments from outside sources:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7434309

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027439041

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Connecticut to limit access to guns for people on watch lists: governor [View all] sarisataka Dec 2015 OP

You would think so sarisataka Dec 2015 #4

When it became about GUNS. eom. GGJohn Dec 2015 #2

Interesting. Previous articles made it sound like just the petronius Dec 2015 #3