Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

George II

(67,782 posts)

14. A few points:

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Sat Dec 12, 2015, 02:07 PM

Dec 2015

1. This only covers mass shootings, not all mass murders. Timothy McVeigh was a native born Irish Catholic and he killed 165 people.

2. People forget that Syed Farook was born in the United States - does Donald Trump know this? His ban wouldn't have affected Farook.

The bottom line is that even though there are mass murders more frequently than we'd like, there really isn't enough statistical data to assign any trend to these murders.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Well, Look At THIS: Mass Shooting Casualties, by Religion of Perpetrator: Muslim vs. Non-Muslim [View all] kpete Dec 2015 OP

Muslims can't be more than 2% of the American population. Yo_Mama Dec 2015 #1

You can see them on the chart SheilaT Dec 2015 #10

I once a knew a Hare Krishna who seemed quite capable of it. forest444 Dec 2015 #12

you think abuse of wives is something new ? JI7 Dec 2015 #19

No, I never said that. forest444 Dec 2015 #20

the hare Krishnas have always been creepy and cultish with history of sex abuse JI7 Dec 2015 #21

I see. I really didn't know. forest444 Dec 2015 #22

Damn as small a part of the poulation as they are, they did all that? linuxman Dec 2015 #2

Approx 14% of the US population is responsible for the 5173 murders in 2014. pocoloco Dec 2015 #11

14% of 350 million is about 49 million people!!?!?!! rgbecker Dec 2015 #29

I'm intrigued by the huge spikes in that graph. What was it about 2007-8 and then 2012-13?? reformist2 Dec 2015 #3

Presidential election years. eom Fawke Em Dec 2015 #7

There you go again ... pesky, unfortunate facts. Oh, Mother Jones. Well that accounts for it. libdem4life Dec 2015 #4

I don't even see religious persuation in their source data B2G Dec 2015 #5

color code kpete Dec 2015 #6

In the source data B2G Dec 2015 #8

The graph is a poor way to display this information - hedgehog Dec 2015 #9

"And of course, who is to define a Moslem (sic)"? Dragonfli Dec 2015 #15

I learned something today - "Moslem" is what Babyboomers were taught to use: hedgehog Dec 2015 #17

Yes. Igel Dec 2015 #24

No skin off my nose, it's just a matter of courtesy. hedgehog Dec 2015 #26

the majority of American terrorists azureblue Dec 2015 #13

A few points: George II Dec 2015 #14

911 is completely left out B2G Dec 2015 #16

Good points. This discussion is skirting around the edges of being Islamophobic. George II Dec 2015 #18

The distinction between Igel Dec 2015 #25

Right, and meanwhile Trump is chasing all over the country using those TWO (not one) people.... George II Dec 2015 #28

Break down the shootings that had religion as the primary motivating factor in the shooting. FLPanhandle Dec 2015 #23

Re that graph--are they mass shootings globally or just in the U.S.? valerief Dec 2015 #27

Watch out... deathrind Dec 2015 #30