Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
12. You are just wrong... Wrong, wrong, wrong...
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 06:31 PM
Dec 2015

This would apparently be the first time in the new ST movies that the ship gets destroyed.

Now indeed in the first two, that ship got pretty screwed up, but it was not destroyed. In fact, as you can clearly see the NCC-1701 on the top of the ship as it flies by in the trailer. This is still the same (as yet) un-destroyed ship they have been flying since the first new ST came out.

Now in the first two movies the ship did take a beating, however it came through not destroyed in both.

This is an entirely new timeline, so the old movie ST stuff is not going to happen. However, in both timelines, Khan did kill one of the crew (Kirk and Spock). So why wouldn't the ole NCC-1701 get destroyed in a movie like they did in ST III? How cool will it be to see the next in line of the Constitution class ships - NCC-1701-A and 1701-B (Sulu commanded this one)?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Doesn't hold a candle to Star Trek V or Star Trek: Nemesis, does it? Orrex Dec 2015 #1
Gotta get through the alphabet somehow. (nt) jeff47 Dec 2015 #2
You mean have a good premise to work off of like the original Wraith of Khan? Rex Dec 2015 #3
You're right about STNG, then the very first NG movie, dead ship! nt ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2015 #4
Yeah the movies were just a matter of waiting for the ship to plow into a city etc.. Rex Dec 2015 #21
As far as I recall, the ship has only "died" twice Orrex Dec 2015 #7
The TV series yes, the movies no. Rex Dec 2015 #20
Their starship insurance premiums must be through the roof! Heeeeers Johnny Dec 2015 #5
I hear they're underwritten by Lloyd's of Rigel 7 Art_from_Ark Dec 2015 #22
Lol. True Liberal_in_LA Dec 2015 #37
I'm game and can't wait Iliyah Dec 2015 #6
Well since this is an alternate universe MattBaggins Dec 2015 #8
I like Star Trek, I like the Beastie Boys. I do not like this trailer. Nailzberg Dec 2015 #9
They used one of their songs in the first reboot (2009) Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2015 #11
The same song. Orsino Dec 2015 #24
Peculiar since of the many "Enterprise" ships operated by the Navy... Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #10
Didn't one of the HMS Enterprises hit a mine and sink? Glassunion Dec 2015 #13
HMS would mean the vessel was British. The only two iterations of Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #44
You are just wrong... Wrong, wrong, wrong... Glassunion Dec 2015 #12
Technically, you're right. My point is the ship is always getting messed up or destroyed yet... ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2015 #15
That's what the TV shows are for. Glassunion Dec 2015 #17
Holy shit!! Do you post on Star Trek Youtube videos? You just said (in your last couple of posts) ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2015 #18
No I've never commented on a Star Trek video on you tube. Glassunion Dec 2015 #19
Yeh, whatever happened to their shields? Aren't those there to protect the hull? Bucky Dec 2015 #26
They have shields but they require a lot of power. It weakens as it take hits and eventually they... ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2015 #27
Given the frequency of this "shredding" it seems they need some major redesigning Bucky Dec 2015 #29
But, on the other hand, Scotty is smart enough to have devised the formula for transwarp beaming... ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2015 #30
Wait, didn't they already come up with a personal-sized intersteller transporter in the 2nd movie? Bucky Dec 2015 #31
No one ryan_cats Dec 2015 #39
Wait! Wait! Spoiler alert elias49 Dec 2015 #14
A trailer spoiler!!1!! I'm such an asshole! nt ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2015 #16
I had the same reaction. Kermitt Gribble Dec 2015 #23
Scotty said in Into Darkness: "I thought we were explorers!" I agree with him. ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2015 #25
Just saw the trailer Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2015 #28
Well they just don't build them like the NSEA Protector anymore Monk06 Dec 2015 #32
Why are people messing with the historical documents? n/t lumberjack_jeff Dec 2015 #33
What are all these choppy things doing in a hallway? This episode was badly written!! The person Monk06 Dec 2015 #34
I was glad to see that Guy Fleegman got a last name in the remakes. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2015 #35
And Laliari got a job on the remake too Monk06 Dec 2015 #36
It's not Sulu's fault! SwankyXomb Dec 2015 #38
Haha, I came across a vid the other days of all of JJ's lens flares from ST2009 - it's 8-1/2 mins! ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2015 #41
That's a horrible trailer, but I loved the last two movies. /nt Marr Dec 2015 #40
Do I have to care? Atman Dec 2015 #42
I'm hardly a fanboy, lol. I missed all of DS9 and Voyager. I never had a fanboy card, much less am ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2015 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ugh! Does the U.S.S. Ente...»Reply #12