Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Christmas comes early for GMO food labelers ! [View all]
Surveys show that 93% of American consumers want GMO foods labelled. A bill slipped through the House earlier this year to try and stop Vermont, CT, maine and other states from delivering this information to consumers. With yet another GOP shutdown looming it was feared that they would try to attach "the Dark Bill" to spending bills that are required to keep the government from shutting down but the approved Federal spending bill
1. Will NOT stop states from proceeding with voter-mandated GMO food labeling, and
2. REQUIRE labeling of GE Salmon
Three states, Connecticut, Maine and Vermont, have passed such laws, with Vermont's slated be to be the first to go into effect in July 2016. All three democratically passed laws would have been nullified, while any future state GE labeling legislation would have been preempted. Over 30 states have introduced bills to labeling GE foods in just the past few years.
"We are very pleased that Congress has apparently decided not to undermine Americans' right to know about the food the purchase and feed their families," said Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of Center for Food Safety. "Adding a rider to the budget bill that would nullify state laws requiring labeling and even forbidden federal agencies from mandating labeling would have been profoundly undemocratic and nothing short of legislative malfeasance. We will remain vigilant over the coming days and into the next legislative session to ensure our right to know is protected."
"We are very pleased that Congress has apparently decided not to undermine Americans' right to know about the food the purchase and feed their families," said Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of Center for Food Safety. "Adding a rider to the budget bill that would nullify state laws requiring labeling and even forbidden federal agencies from mandating labeling would have been profoundly undemocratic and nothing short of legislative malfeasance. We will remain vigilant over the coming days and into the next legislative session to ensure our right to know is protected."
http://www.wireservice.ca/index.php?module=News&func=display&sid=17895
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yeah, I get similar reactions from climate change deniers, anti-vaxers, and the like.
Buzz Clik
Dec 2015
#9
But you can't read labels. Because an informed consumer is the LAST thing we want!
closeupready
Dec 2015
#15
soon enough the TPP will put an end to such nonsense, as well as food origins nt
msongs
Dec 2015
#14
A scam would imply that the label is saying something false. If I see a label on a salt shaker that
Ed Suspicious
Dec 2015
#26
Chocolate bars usually contain ingredients other than cacao, which may be GM:
Denzil_DC
Dec 2015
#33
Dog meat is just as safe as cow meat, but we demand to know what we're getting
NightWatcher
Dec 2015
#36
A label gives the government's stamp of approval that GMO foods are potentially dangerous
cpwm17
Dec 2015
#39
Why would a label necessarily do that? People are asking for INFORMATION labels.
Denzil_DC
Dec 2015
#41