Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
6. The charges against him are quite serious
Wed May 30, 2012, 07:55 PM
May 2012

This is not about sex, this is about a politician who essentially used bribery to cover up a personal scandal. The affair is not a huge issue with me, that is between him and his family and I don't really see it as any of my business. Using campaign dollars to cover it up however is a big deal, many working class people donated their hard earned money to his campaign having no clue it was being used for this.

I think Edwards brought the hell he is going through on himself and I think he deserves to be prosecuted, I will say however that it does bother me that these politicians only seem to be held to account when sex is involved. Money corrupts politics in so many ways and there is such massive corruption in Washington but it rarely seems to be prosecuted unless it involves sex. That is my only problem with the Edwards prosecution, there are so many other politicians who are just as corrupt or more so but as long as they keep their pants on they don't ever seem to be held to account for it. A politician's sex life is none of my business, how they use money to influence public policy is and I wish more corrupt politicians were prosecuted because way too many of them are corrupt and they don't get prosecuted for that corruption no matter how blatant it is.

He used campaign donations to fund his girlfriend banned from Kos May 2012 #1
wow. must be a first. prosecuted for it, i mean. HiPointDem May 2012 #9
It is a crime, and it is frequently punished - bhikkhu May 2012 #32
wow, that is soooooo long of a list. not. HiPointDem May 2012 #33
I read your entire list dsc May 2012 #49
I suppose I haven't look over the finer details bhikkhu May 2012 #54
the fact is the vast majority of that list isn't about misuse of campaign funds dsc Jun 2012 #60
Two Americas Hawkowl May 2012 #2
+1 philly_bob May 2012 #17
bullshit. Mr. Hedgfund used the 99% and particularly the poor cali May 2012 #22
And you were a prophet. Ken Burch May 2012 #56
yup! SammyWinstonJack May 2012 #30
Hello. The Edwards prosecution\persecution was a demonstration coalition_unwilling May 2012 #44
+1, and there was a lot of local politics involved magical thyme May 2012 #48
Will the aquittal screw up the congressional campaign of the chief persecutor? Ken Burch May 2012 #57
hope so. at least he won't be helped it. nt magical thyme May 2012 #58
and why ISNT senator Ensign on trial. leftyohiolib May 2012 #3
Because He Beat The Prosecutor In A State-Wide Race Some Years Ago, Sir The Magistrate May 2012 #4
Nope. Edwards' Senate run was his first campaign -- and in fact his only campaign, other struggle4progress May 2012 #11
My Mistake, Sir: Donated Money To The Man Mr. Edwards Defeated.... The Magistrate May 2012 #13
Please don't tell me you gave money to Lauch Faircloth struggle4progress May 2012 #18
I'm pretty sure that the other poster did mean that Holding was the Faircloth donor Ken Burch May 2012 #40
Illegal use of campaign funds. DCBob May 2012 #5
Even if that's true, everybody else who did that Ken Burch May 2012 #23
His crime goes deeper than the typical. DCBob May 2012 #28
Dude, that's the same post I just responded to. Ken Burch May 2012 #31
Sorry, I my have not copied the link correctly... this post: DCBob May 2012 #35
but were they campaign dollars? I followed this trial closely cali May 2012 #37
I defer to you on that. I have not followed the trial closely. DCBob May 2012 #39
And it would have been more than punishment enough Ken Burch May 2012 #43
You asked why he was put on trial. DCBob May 2012 #50
And in that post, you posted the same previous post and a LINK to the same previous post Ken Burch May 2012 #42
Nope. Less deep than typical, in fact. HiPointDem May 2012 #34
The charges against him are quite serious Bjorn Against May 2012 #6
+1 jillan May 2012 #20
for acting like a republican? eom ellenfl May 2012 #7
so everyone could know what a dirty boy he is. what better use of the court system? HiPointDem May 2012 #8
This is a political trial. former9thward May 2012 #10
Because we're a nation of puritanical hypocrites. n/t A HERETIC I AM May 2012 #12
Because he siphoned campaign money to his lover. Odin2005 May 2012 #14
And usually fraud is punished with huge fines Taverner May 2012 #16
The funds were used Ken Burch May 2012 #21
nah, he knew. cali May 2012 #24
Ok...thanks for clarifying. Ken Burch May 2012 #27
how could it be "campaign money" if the campaign was over before he got it? grasswire Jun 2012 #62
In NC, the Republican powers that be were just waiting for something they could take him down with Taverner May 2012 #15
Flirting with jurors. FSogol May 2012 #19
nonsense. he was already one of the most despised cali May 2012 #38
JFK? before or after the motorcade? Ken Burch May 2012 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author freshwest May 2012 #25
30 years is excessive. Crazy excessive. yodermon May 2012 #26
The FEC agrees with you nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #29
Edwards had already destroyed any viability he had cali May 2012 #36
Excellent analysis, cali. Ken Burch May 2012 #46
He turned me into a newt slackmaster May 2012 #41
That explains it! Burn the witch, then! Ken Burch May 2012 #45
One word Life Long Dem May 2012 #51
"payback" would have covered it. Ken Burch May 2012 #52
He was a Democrat rufus dog May 2012 #53
True. Ken Burch May 2012 #55
The prosecution was a joke. Vattel May 2012 #59
Because he thought with his cock and not his head? cherokeeprogressive Jun 2012 #61
Hey, I wasn't saying the guy isn't a scumbag. Ken Burch Jun 2012 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Remind me again...why WAS...»Reply #6