Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)


(91,565 posts)
Sat Dec 19, 2015, 06:32 PM Dec 2015

If someone agrees to the TOS of a site by checking a box, should they be held to that? [View all]

24 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited
24 (100%)
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Democrat party has not selected a candidate yet so the TOS do not apply tularetom Dec 2015 #1
Democrat-ic n/t leftstreet Dec 2015 #2
I'm not sure there is anything Democrat-ic about it tularetom Dec 2015 #5
Point taken leftstreet Dec 2015 #8
I bet this guy ... JoePhilly Dec 2015 #9
Actually, that wasn't the question was it. Reading is fundamental still_one Dec 2015 #10
According to Skinner himself, your interpretation of the TOS is WRONG: MohRokTah Dec 2015 #16
So since you have claimed fully two times you will not vote for Bernie betterdemsonly Dec 2015 #31
The "Democrat party" ?? oberliner Dec 2015 #18
Why adopt Right Wing usage when referring to the Democratic Party? It really does not look good. nt Hekate Dec 2015 #33
Honesty.... daleanime Dec 2015 #3
Do you mean like in the same manner as edgineered Dec 2015 #4
Loyalty Oaths are sooooo 1950s. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2015 #6
excuse me, do you know what agree to TOS for a moderated site means? still_one Dec 2015 #7
If it is consistent, sure. But there are a few Clinton supporters who say they won't vote for Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #11
You should read what Skinner has to say about this as of today MohRokTah Dec 2015 #19
Except that wasn't my question. It was a generic question still_one Dec 2015 #23
Crist. n/t demmiblue Dec 2015 #12
People, and I'm looking at everyone from the admins down, should cut it out. ScreamingMeemie Dec 2015 #13
Bye, Felicia. bigwillq Dec 2015 #14
Coffee. ScreamingMeemie Dec 2015 #15
Put it on DWS' tab. bigwillq Dec 2015 #17
. ScreamingMeemie Dec 2015 #20
Just trying to be entertaining. bigwillq Dec 2015 #22
I'm working too! sort of... ScreamingMeemie Dec 2015 #24
I have that problem with words sometimes. bigwillq Dec 2015 #26
Hahahaha. I don't bother with alerts for juries anymore. ScreamingMeemie Dec 2015 #27
I was just seeing how consistent the Jury was. bigwillq Dec 2015 #28
Or defending bullshit locks... eom Purveyor Dec 2015 #29
Bravo to the adult response! n/t Hepburn Dec 2015 #25
Only if both teams agree. Rex Dec 2015 #21
Yes, why the ban was ridicolous nadinbrzezinski Dec 2015 #30
That seems to only count depending on which protected group you are in. hobbit709 Dec 2015 #32
Yep, those who are playing on Team Clinton aren't going to be banned davidpdx Dec 2015 #37
Ooohhh, let's have a Coke vs. Pepsi poll next! MattSh Dec 2015 #34
No one reads the TOS Liberal_in_LA Dec 2015 #35
Uh that is not an excuse... uriel1972 Dec 2015 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If someone agrees to the ...