Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If someone agrees to the TOS of a site by checking a box, should they be held to that? [View all]Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)11. If it is consistent, sure. But there are a few Clinton supporters who say they won't vote for
Bernie if he is the nominee and they spend lots of time asserting reasons not to. One of them did the exact same thing in 08, 'I would die before I vote for that fake Barrrack, he can't win, he's not a Democrat, waste of a nomination, won't do it' and that person is posting the same material aimed at Bernie.
So I love the rules, but only if they are justly and equally enforced.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If someone agrees to the TOS of a site by checking a box, should they be held to that? [View all]
still_one
Dec 2015
OP
Why adopt Right Wing usage when referring to the Democratic Party? It really does not look good. nt
Hekate
Dec 2015
#33
If it is consistent, sure. But there are a few Clinton supporters who say they won't vote for
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2015
#11
People, and I'm looking at everyone from the admins down, should cut it out.
ScreamingMeemie
Dec 2015
#13