Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)

22. Just trying to be entertaining.

Reply to ScreamingMeemie (Reply #20)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 08:30 PM

Dec 2015

LOL

Work is soooo slow. I can't wait to leave so I can watch the NFL game and drink.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If someone agrees to the TOS of a site by checking a box, should they be held to that? [View all] still_one Dec 2015 OP

The Democrat party has not selected a candidate yet so the TOS do not apply tularetom Dec 2015 #1

Democrat-ic n/t leftstreet Dec 2015 #2

I'm not sure there is anything Democrat-ic about it tularetom Dec 2015 #5

Point taken leftstreet Dec 2015 #8

I bet this guy ... JoePhilly Dec 2015 #9

Actually, that wasn't the question was it. Reading is fundamental still_one Dec 2015 #10

According to Skinner himself, your interpretation of the TOS is WRONG: MohRokTah Dec 2015 #16

So since you have claimed fully two times you will not vote for Bernie betterdemsonly Dec 2015 #31

The "Democrat party" ?? oberliner Dec 2015 #18

Why adopt Right Wing usage when referring to the Democratic Party? It really does not look good. nt Hekate Dec 2015 #33

Honesty.... daleanime Dec 2015 #3

Do you mean like in the same manner as edgineered Dec 2015 #4

Loyalty Oaths are sooooo 1950s. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2015 #6

excuse me, do you know what agree to TOS for a moderated site means? still_one Dec 2015 #7

If it is consistent, sure. But there are a few Clinton supporters who say they won't vote for Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #11

You should read what Skinner has to say about this as of today MohRokTah Dec 2015 #19

Except that wasn't my question. It was a generic question still_one Dec 2015 #23

Crist. n/t demmiblue Dec 2015 #12

People, and I'm looking at everyone from the admins down, should cut it out. ScreamingMeemie Dec 2015 #13

Bye, Felicia. bigwillq Dec 2015 #14

Coffee. ScreamingMeemie Dec 2015 #15

Put it on DWS' tab. bigwillq Dec 2015 #17

. ScreamingMeemie Dec 2015 #20

Just trying to be entertaining. bigwillq Dec 2015 #22

I'm working too! sort of... ScreamingMeemie Dec 2015 #24

I have that problem with words sometimes. bigwillq Dec 2015 #26

Hahahaha. I don't bother with alerts for juries anymore. ScreamingMeemie Dec 2015 #27

I was just seeing how consistent the Jury was. bigwillq Dec 2015 #28

Or defending bullshit locks... eom Purveyor Dec 2015 #29

Bravo to the adult response! n/t Hepburn Dec 2015 #25

Only if both teams agree. Rex Dec 2015 #21

Yes, why the ban was ridicolous nadinbrzezinski Dec 2015 #30

That seems to only count depending on which protected group you are in. hobbit709 Dec 2015 #32

Yep, those who are playing on Team Clinton aren't going to be banned davidpdx Dec 2015 #37

Ooohhh, let's have a Coke vs. Pepsi poll next! MattSh Dec 2015 #34

No one reads the TOS Liberal_in_LA Dec 2015 #35

Uh that is not an excuse... uriel1972 Dec 2015 #36