Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Graphic: Who Pays Taxes [View all]DirkGently
(12,151 posts)60. Which of the five studies did you not see?
Pretty straightforward, no?
In the first place, almost no economists believe that the incidence of corporate income taxation falls on consumers. Most studies show that the actual burden of the tax is unequally divided between corporate shareholders, the corporation itself and the corporations employees but never consumers. In 1962, Arnold Harberger, a conservative University of Chicago economist and colleague of Milton Friedman did a careful study of the incidence (distribution of the burden) of the corporate tax and found that it fell largely on corporate shareholders in the form of lower dividends and stock value. Other studies show some ratio of distribution between labor and management, but it almost never includes consumers of the corporation's output. Another free market economist, Bruce Bartlett (a former Reagan adviser), explains why;
"...most people assume that the corporate income tax is largely paid by consumers of its products or services. That is, they assume that although the tax is nominally levied on the corporation as a whole, in fact the burden of the tax is shifted onto customers in the form of higher prices. All economists reject that idea. They point out that prices are set by market forces and the suppliers of goods and services arent only C-corporations, which pay taxes on the corporate tax schedule, but also sole proprietorships, partnerships and S-corporations that are taxed under the individual income tax. Other suppliers include foreign corporations and nonprofits. Therefore, corporations cannot raise prices to compensate for the corporate income tax because they will be undercut by businesses to which the tax does not apply."
"...most people assume that the corporate income tax is largely paid by consumers of its products or services. That is, they assume that although the tax is nominally levied on the corporation as a whole, in fact the burden of the tax is shifted onto customers in the form of higher prices. All economists reject that idea. They point out that prices are set by market forces and the suppliers of goods and services arent only C-corporations, which pay taxes on the corporate tax schedule, but also sole proprietorships, partnerships and S-corporations that are taxed under the individual income tax. Other suppliers include foreign corporations and nonprofits. Therefore, corporations cannot raise prices to compensate for the corporate income tax because they will be undercut by businesses to which the tax does not apply."
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/5/8/1297707/-Do-Corporate-Income-Taxes-Really-Get-Passed-On-To-Consumers-Another-Conservative-Zombie-Myth
Here are a few more examples of what economists say on the issue. As you'll see, some disagree slightly with each other, but nobody takes the "corporations just pass on all their taxes" fantasy position.
Who Pays the Corporate Income Tax?
One way or another, though, actual people have to ultimately pay the tax. Consumers pay it if companies respond to corporate taxes by raising the price of their products. Workers pay the tax if corporations respond by lowering wages. Shareholders pay the tax if it simply eats into profits and lowers share prices.
But which is it? Bruce Bartlett reports today that the March issue of the National Tax Journal has four articles that address this question. Here are the answers:
Article #1: Shareholders pay 100 percent.
Article #2: Shareholders pay 100 percent.
Article #3: Shareholders pay 40 percent, workers pay 60 percent.
Article #4: Shareholders pay 82 percent, workers pay 18 percent.
One way or another, though, actual people have to ultimately pay the tax. Consumers pay it if companies respond to corporate taxes by raising the price of their products. Workers pay the tax if corporations respond by lowering wages. Shareholders pay the tax if it simply eats into profits and lowers share prices.
But which is it? Bruce Bartlett reports today that the March issue of the National Tax Journal has four articles that address this question. Here are the answers:
Article #1: Shareholders pay 100 percent.
Article #2: Shareholders pay 100 percent.
Article #3: Shareholders pay 40 percent, workers pay 60 percent.
Article #4: Shareholders pay 82 percent, workers pay 18 percent.
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/02/who-pays-corporate-income-ta
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's cheaper and easier for the govt to police a few corporations instead of millions of Americans.
grahamhgreen
Dec 2015
#6
You'd like the people who get millions in salaries to get it tax free?
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2015
#15
id rather have the corporations collect them cause then if i decide not to buy their product
saturnsring
Dec 2015
#5
if their tax rate was 20% and no one bought anythng they had to sell who would pay their 20%
saturnsring
Dec 2015
#13
That's not really correct. Companies generally don't keep prices "low" out of the goodness of their
MillennialDem
Dec 2015
#33
That only applies in a cartel or monopoly scenario, and in the cartel scenario it only
MillennialDem
Dec 2015
#37
Yeah it is but you're a true believer and no amount of evidence will change your view
MillennialDem
Dec 2015
#39
Nope. Corporations do not just "pass on" all the taxes they pay. They can't.
DirkGently
Dec 2015
#19
So you agree no economists think corporate taxes are "generally" passed on to consumers.
DirkGently
Dec 2015
#54
Economists establishing corporate taxes aren't passed to consumers was probably "the best."
DirkGently
Dec 2015
#73
I assume the material in this post was written by an academic "economist".
former9thward
Dec 2015
#51
If you look closely, you can just barely make out the system "fix" that Bill Clinton made
Bucky
Dec 2015
#4
I would agree to eliminating all corp. taxes in exchange for no corporate campaign contributions
Yavin4
Dec 2015
#26
Those "market forces" are working well for the corporations...for us, not so much...
Bigmack
Dec 2015
#64
They'll just whine that the $4,000 per year is letting them keep their own hard earned money - which
MillennialDem
Dec 2015
#35
Do the corporations get tax breaks for expense of lobbyists and politicians on the payroll?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2015
#46