Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

betterdemsonly

(1,967 posts)

31. So since you have claimed fully two times you will not vote for Bernie

Reply to MohRokTah (Reply #16)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 11:08 PM

Dec 2015

if he is the nominee, Skinner can read your mind that you are not serious, but Manny who has only done this once,Skinner can read his mind that he is and that is why you are still here and he is banned.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If someone agrees to the TOS of a site by checking a box, should they be held to that? [View all] still_one Dec 2015 OP

The Democrat party has not selected a candidate yet so the TOS do not apply tularetom Dec 2015 #1

Democrat-ic n/t leftstreet Dec 2015 #2

I'm not sure there is anything Democrat-ic about it tularetom Dec 2015 #5

Point taken leftstreet Dec 2015 #8

I bet this guy ... JoePhilly Dec 2015 #9

Actually, that wasn't the question was it. Reading is fundamental still_one Dec 2015 #10

According to Skinner himself, your interpretation of the TOS is WRONG: MohRokTah Dec 2015 #16

So since you have claimed fully two times you will not vote for Bernie betterdemsonly Dec 2015 #31

The "Democrat party" ?? oberliner Dec 2015 #18

Why adopt Right Wing usage when referring to the Democratic Party? It really does not look good. nt Hekate Dec 2015 #33

Honesty.... daleanime Dec 2015 #3

Do you mean like in the same manner as edgineered Dec 2015 #4

Loyalty Oaths are sooooo 1950s. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2015 #6

excuse me, do you know what agree to TOS for a moderated site means? still_one Dec 2015 #7

If it is consistent, sure. But there are a few Clinton supporters who say they won't vote for Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #11

You should read what Skinner has to say about this as of today MohRokTah Dec 2015 #19

Except that wasn't my question. It was a generic question still_one Dec 2015 #23

Crist. n/t demmiblue Dec 2015 #12

People, and I'm looking at everyone from the admins down, should cut it out. ScreamingMeemie Dec 2015 #13

Bye, Felicia. bigwillq Dec 2015 #14

Coffee. ScreamingMeemie Dec 2015 #15

Put it on DWS' tab. bigwillq Dec 2015 #17

. ScreamingMeemie Dec 2015 #20

Just trying to be entertaining. bigwillq Dec 2015 #22

I'm working too! sort of... ScreamingMeemie Dec 2015 #24

I have that problem with words sometimes. bigwillq Dec 2015 #26

Hahahaha. I don't bother with alerts for juries anymore. ScreamingMeemie Dec 2015 #27

I was just seeing how consistent the Jury was. bigwillq Dec 2015 #28

Or defending bullshit locks... eom Purveyor Dec 2015 #29

Bravo to the adult response! n/t Hepburn Dec 2015 #25

Only if both teams agree. Rex Dec 2015 #21

Yes, why the ban was ridicolous nadinbrzezinski Dec 2015 #30

That seems to only count depending on which protected group you are in. hobbit709 Dec 2015 #32

Yep, those who are playing on Team Clinton aren't going to be banned davidpdx Dec 2015 #37

Ooohhh, let's have a Coke vs. Pepsi poll next! MattSh Dec 2015 #34

No one reads the TOS Liberal_in_LA Dec 2015 #35

Uh that is not an excuse... uriel1972 Dec 2015 #36