Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marasinghe

(1,253 posts)
8. ridiculous post. but, he appears to be from the "Kill 'em all & let God sort 'em out" T-shirt ....
Wed May 30, 2012, 08:34 PM
May 2012

.... school of foreign policy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hmmmmm. I wonder what would make the "liberal law professor" behave this way? NYC_SKP May 2012 #1
A cynic might suggest that he feels it is more important to appear tough on terror morningfog May 2012 #2
We shouldn't have questioned Bush then either. Clearly he "knew stuff", eh? Bonobo May 2012 #3
Bush didn't make claims going into the election. NYC_SKP May 2012 #6
I'm done with him whatchamacallit May 2012 #4
So voting for Romney? Please expand on your comment! Logical May 2012 #14
Where did that person say they were going to vote for Romney? Marr May 2012 #15
Ok Einstein, explain wat he means! Logical May 2012 #19
Maybe it means he won't vote for Obama. nt Bonobo May 2012 #21
Maybe it means that he is not going to run for Congress. AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #25
Not voting for Obama is not the same as voting for Romney. Marr May 2012 #28
K&R DeSwiss May 2012 #5
yup ... Obama is just like Hitler. JoePhilly May 2012 #7
ridiculous post. but, he appears to be from the "Kill 'em all & let God sort 'em out" T-shirt .... marasinghe May 2012 #8
The post I respond do describes the run up to nazi Germany. JoePhilly May 2012 #9
Joe, in all honesty... Bonobo May 2012 #10
thanks for the OP & the reply, Bonobo. marasinghe May 2012 #12
I hear you well. Bonobo May 2012 #13
If its such a big secret, why do we know all about it. JoePhilly May 2012 #17
Reductio ad absurdum Bonobo May 2012 #18
+1,000,000,000 x 1,000,000,000 - n/t coalition_unwilling May 2012 #27
"...unless there is explicit intelligence posthumously proving them innocent." cherokeeprogressive May 2012 #11
+1. nt riderinthestorm May 2012 #16
We've gone from innocent until proven guilty, followed by the sentence. BlueCheese May 2012 #26
His actions, of course, are creating the precedent for the actions of every successive President. AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #20
Yes, and I do not see how that (obvious) point could be so cavalierly dismissed. Bonobo May 2012 #23
His will surrendered to principles. Luminous Animal May 2012 #22
Those towers... Bonobo May 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New York Times: "Sec...»Reply #8