General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Cigarette smoking. [View all]SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)I have no objection to using tax dollars for anti-smoking campaigns. I would have no objection to using tax dollars to force tobacco companies to disclose ingredients and to stop putting (more) poison in them. (Which is never going to happen.)
I am also going to leave the area rapidly if someone is smoking in it.
What I am not going to do is personally harangue individuals, nor judge them, after they are already hooked. (At least I hope I don't - others would have to be the judge of that.)
I only judge people who are foolish enough to start to a certain extent, since I'm sure the tobacco companies still find plenty of ways to push them to the young (and virtually nobody starts as an adult).
And, no, I don't think it's cool, I think it's yucky.
But I don't think your analogy holds water, since quitting, I hear, is not as easy as grabbing a life ring. And some people, I hear, actually don't want to quit. Well, it's a free country, and it's legal.