Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RevStPatrick

(2,208 posts)
13. Is that all you got?
Thu May 31, 2012, 10:20 AM
May 2012

The old "empty lives" routine?
"Cross draggin' cred"?
You obviously don't know me, but that's OK.

When I made my post in the BOG group, I wasn't really paying attention to where I was, just to what was being said. I suppose I didn't realize at the time that there are places now on DU3 where one simply is not allowed to say what one wants to say. Some rah-rah group host decided to call me ignorant and ban me from saying what appeared to me to be the obvious.

When Bush was expanding presidential power, part of the reason why we here at DU were opposed to what he was doing, was so that future presidents would not have inappropriate powers over we, the people. Now that it's a Dem president that has those powers, and is extending some of those powers even further, it's OK?

And it's not appropriate to point out that "our" president is now using executive powers that we wouldn't want the "other guys" to have? Does it not bother you that "our" president has a list of people he wants assassinated by drones without any kind of legal protections for those to be assassinated? And if some kids or other innocents just happen to be there when the bombs rain down and get caught in the crossfire, it just "collateral damage" and "oh well!"? Do you want Romney to have that kind of power? Didn't we spend years here complaining about Bush having that kind of power?

I suppose I need to take Ari Fleischer's advice, and "be careful what I say"?
Is that how it works now?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

As always, the Rude Pundit is spot on, MadHound May 2012 #1
"And we're supposed to be fine with it" gratuitous May 2012 #2
people *are* fine with it MisterP May 2012 #8
Hear hear! woo me with science May 2012 #3
"... supposed to be making oh-so-delightful Donald Trump jokes..." whatchamacallit May 2012 #4
Rude DURec KG May 2012 #5
No it sucks abelenkpe May 2012 #6
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #7
You went to the BOG and said Obama = Bush? JNelson6563 May 2012 #10
Is that all you got? RevStPatrick May 2012 #13
There have been "safe havens" on DU for years. JNelson6563 May 2012 #14
Groups and hosts are a relatively new phenomenon. RevStPatrick May 2012 #15
This was too absurd to get past the 1st paragraph Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #9
Almost trying too hard. JNelson6563 May 2012 #11
The PR is a far better smut writer than Scooter Libby. Hubert Flottz May 2012 #12
Kick woo me with science May 2012 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Rude Pundit - Of Kill...»Reply #13