Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
5. Actually it is necessary
Thu May 31, 2012, 01:02 PM
May 2012

If you want to get the best teachers around, you have to pay for it, same as with any other profession. How many miracles do you think doctors in this country would perform if they were getting the same pay as teachers? How many athletes would go into football so that they can make that one handed, tip toe down the sideline catch if they were getting paid low five figures instead of seven figure salaries.

You get what you pay for. Sure, we had great teachers, lots of them at one time. That was because we had a captive work force. Teaching was the intellectual woman's job, as opposed to the other two women's jobs, nursing and secretary. Thus, you could hire lots and lots of brilliant, great women to be teachers, and pay them shit.

Fast forward to the seventies and eighties, and with the profession after better paying profession opening up to women, why are they going to stick around teaching, when they could get better pay elsewhere?

If you believe that teaching is one of the most important professions around, then you have to pay teachers like you mean it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Rude Pundit - A Tale ...»Reply #5