Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Who are we fighting in Afghanistan? [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)114. Germany?
From the Escalating Escalator to Nowhere Department:
German government prepares new combat mission in Afghanistan
By Johannes Stern
World Socialist Web Site, 16 November 2015
The German government is making plans to send another 100 troops to Afghanistan, raising the size of its deployed force to 980 personnel. These plans were reported last week in a blog post by military journalist Thomas Wiegold, who cited sources within the government.
The report was then effectively confirmed by Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) defence spokesman Rainer Arnold, who told the Berliner Zeitung, The order is not being changed. But the Bundeswehr [army] must be put in a position to fulfill it.
According to Spiegel Online, the cabinet will decide the text of the mandate for 2016 on Wednesday. Subsequently, the Bundestag (parliament) will debate and then vote on it in its last session before the Christmas break. According to the magazine, the Bundeswehr will also remain in northern Afghanistan longer than originally planned. The training mission in Mazar-i-Sharif, the fourth-largest city in the country, will be continued until at least the end of 2016.
The US halted its military withdrawal from Afghanistan in mid-October. Under the new plans of the Pentagon, the current contingent of about 9,800 US troops is to be maintained over the coming year. Contrary to earlier withdrawal plans, the strength of the American troops is only to be reduced at the end of 2016 or even the beginning of 2017.
So far, the German government and a majority of the media are trying to play down the escalation. The claims that German soldiers will not participate in combat operations has been repeated ad nauseam.
Wiegold reports, however, that the mandate of the Bundeswehr would be changed in one point. In the new mandate, support for the Afghan consultative level by German forces will no longer be limited to meetings and the like, but would also be possible in the situation on the ground, Wiegold writes.
In plain language, this means that German soldiers can accompany and advise Afghan forces trained by them in combat situations. One need not be a military expert to understand the consequences of this decision. The German trainers and advisers will be directly involved in hostilities and if necessary defend themselves. The official announcement of new Bundeswehr combat operations in Afghanistan is then only a matter of time.
CONTINUED...
Lots of countries on this escalator heading down. Perhaps our Deutscher allies can better train the locals to ally with our main shared "democratic" ideal, the worship of property.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
131 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Please provide an answer to the question posed in the OP: Who are we fighting in Afganistan. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Jan 2016
#128
We're fighting the POPPY MANUFACTURES....WE WANT TO CONTROL THE HEROIN TRADE AS ALWAYS!
ViseGrip
Jan 2016
#126
Historical note: I think the comment to which you allude came, non from Shrub, but from
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2015
#92
You know whose side we're on in Afghanistan? The "brown people", as you beautifully put it
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2015
#23
I wish I could forget the time Obama repeated Bush line Taliban never offered up bin laden.
Octafish
Dec 2015
#61
We have a commander in chief who knows that is not true, what a ridiculous thing to say
GummyBearz
Dec 2015
#9
Sibel Edmonds knew, so she was fired and slapped with a gag order when she tried to tell. nt
tblue37
Jan 2016
#120
Can you handle the truth? It's to OWN THE LAND. GOOGLE "Mineral wealth of Afghanistan"!!!!
WinkyDink
Dec 2015
#10
And yet there are millions of americans who think that 3000 American lives in NYC would mean
WinkyDink
Jan 2016
#130
Allowing our favored industries first dibs at a trillion dollar's worth of raw materials
arcane1
Dec 2015
#26
The US invasion of Afghanistan was justified and fully supported by many allies.
tabasco
Dec 2015
#46
Did you note that we're still wasting lives and money in Afghanistan, 15 years later?
Scuba
Dec 2015
#50
If that's the only way you can think of to apprehend criminals you're not very thoughtful.
Scuba
Dec 2015
#71
Hey if you want to defend one of the worst foreign policy blunders in American history, be my guest.
Scuba
Dec 2015
#81
In case you haven't noticed, we haven't taken them down, 15 years and a trillion dollars later.
Scuba
Dec 2015
#83
Historical note: the Taliban agreed to extradite bin Laden to a court with international
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2015
#93
So 15 years later and why are we still there? How many decades do we need to be there?
Rex
Dec 2015
#55
''Money trumps peace.'' -- appointed pretzeldent George Walker Bush, Feb. 14, 2007
Octafish
Dec 2015
#73