Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
139. The incident was escalated by the terrorists when they took over the building while armed.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:32 PM
Jan 2016

Coddling terrorists results in emboldening them to greater action.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No. arcane1 Jan 2016 #1
Give them an inch and they'll take a yard. Drunken Irishman Jan 2016 #2
"openly looking to attack the government" by breaking into an empty building and sitting there? arcane1 Jan 2016 #3
lol condoning right-wing militias. Unbelievable. Drunken Irishman Jan 2016 #4
You lie. I don't condone them, I object to burning them alive. arcane1 Jan 2016 #11
lol Drunken Irishman Jan 2016 #16
If you think turning yourself into a militant bombmonger JackInGreen Jan 2016 #77
Handling this sanely isn't appeasement demwing Jan 2016 #84
Same shit was said during the Bundy Ranch standoff MohRokTah Jan 2016 #91
Yeah, let's go and make martyrs of them, that's the way to do it. GGJohn Jan 2016 #95
More of the same shit that was said back then. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #97
So your solution is to kill them before they've committed any violence against GGJohn Jan 2016 #98
My solution is to send in armed federal troops wearing body armor to peacefully remove them. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #99
So you want to escalate the situation so that there will be violence and killing? GGJohn Jan 2016 #100
The situation was already escalated by the terrorists armed insurrection. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #103
I can't believe that I'm reading this shit on a progressive board. GGJohn Jan 2016 #105
I can. But only because I've seen it before. From a select few. pangaia Jan 2016 #178
Yeah, that worked out real well at Ruby Ridge and Waco. GGJohn Jan 2016 #101
Worked fine at Waco. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #104
Yeah, because those children and women deserved to die because of................. GGJohn Jan 2016 #107
David Koresh was responsible for every death, not the federal government. eom MohRokTah Jan 2016 #109
The Feds didn't have to assault the compound like they did, they could have waited a few more GGJohn Jan 2016 #111
The time for waiting had come and passed. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #114
Bullshit!!!! GGJohn Jan 2016 #118
Nope. Everything had been tried. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #119
You are one sick puppy if you believe that killing is preferable to negotiations GGJohn Jan 2016 #122
They already proved they were heavily armed and were violent. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #125
What violence have these militia assholes committed yet? GGJohn Jan 2016 #132
Fine, then when armed troops enter the building to remove them... MohRokTah Jan 2016 #135
Again, why are you so eager to escalate the situation? GGJohn Jan 2016 #138
The incident was escalated by the terrorists when they took over the building while armed. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #139
So you want to escalate it into a possible shootout to satisfy your desire for bloodshed? GGJohn Jan 2016 #141
Your irrational bloodlust duly noted. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #154
Good to know who you really are: Someone who has no problem cali Jan 2016 #151
You're sick. Dude, seek help. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #177
There are an alarming number sarisataka Jan 2016 #153
Funny, I'll bet that most of those advocating violence to end this occupation have GGJohn Jan 2016 #156
Well, a few may have been in a fistfight... Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #158
This is crazy talk and has no place on DU. demmiblue Jan 2016 #106
The mistake at the Bundy ranch was not law enforcement nadinbrzezinski Jan 2016 #173
100% correct. And we hardly ever agree on anything LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #176
It is becauae of people with your take on things, pangaia Jan 2016 #180
Slowly step away from the bottle, GGJohn Jan 2016 #89
Exactly..... daleanime Jan 2016 #112
Me too, GGJohn Jan 2016 #115
Using Napalm is a progressive value, don't you know? hack89 Jan 2016 #127
Shut off water and power, blast spotlights into the windows. ohnoyoudidnt Jan 2016 #7
Probably not...but I tire of them thumbing their nose at the government. Drunken Irishman Jan 2016 #9
So am I. ohnoyoudidnt Jan 2016 #19
I don't think that's a reason to kill demwing Jan 2016 #85
Spotlights and the Barney theme song. Matariki Jan 2016 #52
Jimi's "Star Spangled Banner" played at 11? - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #94
That would drive them nuts, those racist assholes GGJohn Jan 2016 #96
Thanks. For variety, maybe a little KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #108
LOL, even better, GGJohn Jan 2016 #110
I started out calling for the 82nd Airborne, but now Im KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #113
Which is ironic, GGJohn Jan 2016 #120
Wow! Totally unintentional on my part although, now that you KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #126
And the theme from the hit television show - Teletubbies. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #185
Whatever you do, don't let the delivery guy from Domino's or Wok This Way pass in any food! MADem Jan 2016 #57
Shut off power and water, block access and wait. Pretty sure they didn't take unlimited supplies peacebird Jan 2016 #68
And very loud, non-stop music. 48 hours of Rick Astley should do it. nt JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2016 #74
Nah, I say throw on some Snoop Dogg or Dr. Dre. TheMightyFavog Jan 2016 #159
I agree. Dyedinthewoolliberal Jan 2016 #116
We don't need to create a bunch of martyrs. We can arrest them the slow, boring way. pnwmom Jan 2016 #60
It is a Refuge. Fire is not a good idea. They better get firefighters ready. glinda Jan 2016 #18
True, although it's snowing pretty heavily just now. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #157
Their (Waco) death is on Koresh's hands not "ours." Your kind of thinking is what motivated CBGLuthier Jan 2016 #28
It is the OP that said "We did it in Waco." n/t arcane1 Jan 2016 #34
No, the OP said we took care of the situation, your post said "we" burned children to death CBGLuthier Jan 2016 #36
Direct quote from the OP "We did it in Waco." n/t arcane1 Jan 2016 #37
DQ from your post, '"We" burned children to death in Waco. Is that a good thing?' CBGLuthier Jan 2016 #38
No, David Koresh and his band of religious wack-a-loons burned children to death Jake Stern Jan 2016 #148
The PTB created this situation SciFiRK Jan 2016 #5
Agreed. It's why they can't back down now. Drunken Irishman Jan 2016 #8
Agreed, sort of... DO NOT back down demwing Jan 2016 #86
Be careful about advocating violence libodem Jan 2016 #6
The OP is wasted and trolling. No need to take them seriously or support them. n/t arcane1 Jan 2016 #12
K libodem Jan 2016 #20
So, you think the Waco approach was correct? (nt) Nye Bevan Jan 2016 #10
Why 24 hours? XemaSab Jan 2016 #13
Kill 'em, kill 'em all! 'Murica... fuck yeah!!11 demmiblue Jan 2016 #14
Why not? Drunken Irishman Jan 2016 #17
. demmiblue Jan 2016 #25
Results of your jury service DeadLetterOffice Jan 2016 #43
I suggested elsewhere catnhatnh Jan 2016 #15
Skip the middle men sarisataka Jan 2016 #21
We're not talking criminals. We're talking terrorists. Drunken Irishman Jan 2016 #23
So now we can sarisataka Jan 2016 #30
How is it denying them their constitutional right? Drunken Irishman Jan 2016 #40
Typically sarisataka Jan 2016 #45
K&R! n/t RKP5637 Jan 2016 #79
There's a sane response. LuvNewcastle Jan 2016 #146
I think the arsonist guys are terrorists. joshcryer Jan 2016 #47
I agree! Also, one problem is they feel more emboldened and likely a few are RKP5637 Jan 2016 #83
The OP would prefer to make liberals look bad by pretending they are advocating murder. arcane1 Jan 2016 #24
I wish I could say sarisataka Jan 2016 #31
I doubt any non-progressive site would advocate torching the place... Drunken Irishman Jan 2016 #42
Really? sarisataka Jan 2016 #46
I have tried, really hard sarisataka Jan 2016 #155
It's so liberal of you to dismiss this militia as just squatters... Drunken Irishman Jan 2016 #41
Remember Philadelphia stuarttman63 Jan 2016 #22
No it would not be good to see them burned alive... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #81
Solution: blast reggae and pot smoke flamingdem Jan 2016 #26
Or blast Dubstep until they snap. DetlefK Jan 2016 #73
Okay, I've missed something here. SheilaT Jan 2016 #27
Armed "Militia" takes over Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters Electric Monk Jan 2016 #29
Thanks. SheilaT Jan 2016 #93
I suppose all the Republican a---holes running for president and doc03 Jan 2016 #32
nah. I would block their communications underthematrix Jan 2016 #33
Remove anything that's federal or supported by federal money greymattermom Jan 2016 #50
It's a very isolated location. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #164
Once they have been convicted of terrorism, they will lose their gun rights. How delicious! LonePirate Jan 2016 #35
Can't we just send in some Muslims? L. Coyote Jan 2016 #39
You really can't do anything until they shoot or kill someone. joshcryer Jan 2016 #44
Wtf? That's insane. cali Jan 2016 #48
''...or we firebomb the building'' Ichingcarpenter Jan 2016 #49
Sick stuff.. And you are absolutely right. The op is advocating mass murder cali Jan 2016 #55
just alerted I gave him time to edit it or delete it Ichingcarpenter Jan 2016 #58
siege them. cut off the power, water, and seek them up. they can breath, but thats it. pansypoo53219 Jan 2016 #51
Jam the radio, TV and wifi too. ucrdem Jan 2016 #56
Convict them in absentia and peacefully seize their livestock and vehicles while they're "away." ucrdem Jan 2016 #53
Firebomb them? Do want to make these guys martyrs? TheMightyFavog Jan 2016 #54
Don't mean to make light of the situation, but I am so KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #102
make them all martyrs . . . . great idea DrDan Jan 2016 #59
Nope stevil Jan 2016 #61
Just another Occupy movement. n/t Yo_Mama Jan 2016 #62
Armed with guns and threatening to murder Federal Employees... NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #66
Hmmm... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #82
Occupy didn't take over federal property KingFlorez Jan 2016 #128
Firebomb the building? democrank Jan 2016 #63
After 24 hours, cut off all electricity and water and chain the doors shut from the outside egold2604 Jan 2016 #64
You couldn't achieve that with a watch list. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #67
"after they surrender" demwing Jan 2016 #87
We didn't firebomb Waco - the nuts inside torched themselves. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #65
Charge them rent and wait them out. mmonk Jan 2016 #69
Yeah, that's the way... meaculpa2011 Jan 2016 #70
As long as they are not violent, we should not be violent. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #71
I have a better idea: Terrorize them. DetlefK Jan 2016 #72
Re: your idea #3. My wife says the Feds should just give me one of KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #133
LOL GGJohn Jan 2016 #140
+Infinity! - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #144
Burn them out like the did those Branch idiots. ileus Jan 2016 #75
Ffs JackInGreen Jan 2016 #76
I say we build a wall around it and call it the new Oregon Federal Penitentury. nt bklyncowgirl Jan 2016 #78
^^^^^This one ^^^^^ leveymg Jan 2016 #80
Good plan! n/t Chemisse Jan 2016 #88
I like it. eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #92
Actually not a bad idea. Kablooie Jan 2016 #129
What a great idea. Baitball Blogger Jan 2016 #137
The time for coddling terrorists was over on the Bundy Ranch MohRokTah Jan 2016 #90
Why don't we have sleeping gas? Kablooie Jan 2016 #117
Just ask the Russians how well that turned out when they tried the same thing GGJohn Jan 2016 #136
Besides, i could see those kooks as the kind of folks... TheMightyFavog Jan 2016 #162
I wouldn't doubt it, considering how fucking paranoid they are. eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #163
Then send in a robot conker. Kablooie Jan 2016 #169
Nice! A weaponized whack-a-mole. Painted like a like a giant petronius Jan 2016 #188
The issue with any kind of gas there would be getting it in the building. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #161
Helicopter in a huge, plastic dome and drop it over the complex. Kablooie Jan 2016 #170
We do it all over the Middle East too. -none Jan 2016 #121
Waco was a terrible mistake. Baitball Blogger Jan 2016 #123
In Waco, we roasted some children tularetom Jan 2016 #124
WE didn't roast any children. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #160
Did they forget women and children to hide behind? That's what they usually do. brewens Jan 2016 #130
Latest Oregonian article notes that they plan to have kids arrive today. MissB Jan 2016 #165
I agree KingFlorez Jan 2016 #131
No. There are no hostages, it's the only building for miles. JHB Jan 2016 #134
Jeesus, the desire for bloodshed by some on this thread sickens me GGJohn Jan 2016 #142
If they don't clear out before the Spring Migration, JEB Jan 2016 #143
Now there's a weapon of mass destruction (of inflated egos)... JHB Jan 2016 #147
Winter is here. Let the cold do its work. JonathanRackham Jan 2016 #145
Good points, but when they surrender, how about Guantanamo since most of them have declared JCMach1 Jan 2016 #149
Hello Authoritarian left Bonx Jan 2016 #150
The Malheur National Wildlife Refuge cheapdate Jan 2016 #172
So "vacate in 24 hours...or we firebomb the building" is reasonable ? Bonx Jan 2016 #175
I want those assholes removed as quickly cheapdate Jan 2016 #186
Surround the building. deathrind Jan 2016 #152
Sounds like the occupiers may have a legitimate grievance - wundermaus Jan 2016 #166
I think you can be tried and sentenced by multiple jurisdictions for the same crime. n/t cheapdate Jan 2016 #174
Here's what I found. GGJohn Jan 2016 #179
IANAL but I thought it was ruled that the sentencing was illegal Babel_17 Jan 2016 #183
Like your name. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #167
just drop sewage on them with a slurry bomber larkrake Jan 2016 #168
That worked so well to create martyrs at Waco nadinbrzezinski Jan 2016 #171
The Gov't didn't firebomb Waco. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #181
But some of that got going nadinbrzezinski Jan 2016 #182
Wow. What? EriktheRedder Jan 2016 #184
Sorry you had to see this thread so early in your tenure here. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #187
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's simple. The governme...»Reply #139