General Discussion

valerief

(53,235 posts)

51. These are "acceptable terrorists" apparently.

Reply to malaise (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:50 PM

Jan 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

75 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Peace my black ass [View all] malaise Jan 2016 OP

K&R..... daleanime Jan 2016 #1

Hack on CNN - there hasn't been any attack other than occupying malaise Jan 2016 #4

Damn straight. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #2

LOL malaise Jan 2016 #3

Hell yes.... daleanime Jan 2016 #5

If the only difference in the equation was they were black or Muslim... MohRokTah Jan 2016 #6

oh for fuck's sake cali Jan 2016 #7

That would be best n/t Old Codger Jan 2016 #8

Except they are the survivalist types with 2naSalit Jan 2016 #12

Fine, take out the trailers. cali Jan 2016 #14

See, you just escalated the situation. KeepItReal Jan 2016 #16

"they would not rule out violence if police tried to remove them" KeepItReal Jan 2016 #9

So what? GGJohn Jan 2016 #10

By your logic no illegal occupations of land and buildings would be challenged KeepItReal Jan 2016 #15

Ahh, I get it now, you subscribe to the notion that 2 wrongs make a right. GGJohn Jan 2016 #17

No. I'm for ONE STANDARD. Either everyone gets kid gloves or everyone gets the hard line. KeepItReal Jan 2016 #21

So because the cop in St. Louis were assholes, then the Feds should be assholes and start killing GGJohn Jan 2016 #23

Who said anything about killing folks? KeepItReal Jan 2016 #25

There are some on this board who are advocating just that. GGJohn Jan 2016 #27

My first response to the situation was here: KeepItReal Jan 2016 #32

Agreed. eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #34

So the OWS should have been rounded up at gunpoint? Igel Jan 2016 #33

You keep saying 'two wrongs make it right'... one_voice Jan 2016 #49

This message was self-deleted by its author GGJohn Jan 2016 #55

Yes, it is a discussion board.. one_voice Jan 2016 #56

This message was self-deleted by its author GGJohn Jan 2016 #57

No, my opinion isn't in the minority. one_voice Jan 2016 #59

This message was self-deleted by its author GGJohn Jan 2016 #60

WTF?!?! Did you even read what I wrote? one_voice Jan 2016 #63

Ok, then I apologize and will retract my post. eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #64

It's cool. It's a discussion board.. one_voice Jan 2016 #67

Already deleted, to me, that was the right and honorable thing to do. GGJohn Jan 2016 #68

That effin' simple malaise Jan 2016 #58

Thanks for this malaise Jan 2016 #40

Yes, there is, but that doesn't justify doing what some here are advocating. eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #62

That's the same coddling attitude that let them get away with the standoff at the Bundy Ranch. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #18

So, again, you're all for escalating the situation to satisfy your bloodlust? GGJohn Jan 2016 #19

The situation was already escalated by the terrorists. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #20

Have they taken any hostages? NO, GGJohn Jan 2016 #22

They took over a federal building. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #28

SO FUCKING WHAT THEY TOOK OVER A FEDERAL BUILDING? GGJohn Jan 2016 #30

It was empty because of the holiday weekend. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #45

Was it occupied when they broke into it? GGJohn Jan 2016 #47

GG, give us a break. You carry gunz, train to shoot people, have enough gunz to arm this bunch, . . Hoyt Jan 2016 #52

You just can't help yourself Hoyt. GGJohn Jan 2016 #54

GDS... Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #66

Do you see Waco as a good model for handling this type of thing? Nye Bevan Jan 2016 #11

Hopefully we have learned 2naSalit Jan 2016 #13

There is no way to take out the supplies with a drone that doesn't start a firefight. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #24

Yes, 2naSalit Jan 2016 #26

Why not just cut off utilities and surround them? NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #29

I suspect there will be 2naSalit Jan 2016 #31

As long as THEY fire the first shots. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #35

Agreed. nt 2naSalit Jan 2016 #36

That's a great plan, ... JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2016 #37

Some seem a bit gung-ho about creating widows and orphans of Federal employees (nt) Nye Bevan Jan 2016 #39

I am a Federal Employee. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #41

Isn't it better if nobody fires any shots at all? (nt) Nye Bevan Jan 2016 #42

That's the main goal. And if you read my posts, that is what I have been advocating. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #44

You don't have to get shot. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #43

In retrospect, I don't think invoking Waco is really valid. Vinca Jan 2016 #38

I'd say that it is up to the white Christian terrorists. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #46

This message was self-deleted by its author MohRokTah Jan 2016 #48

I don't advocate for treating them the way we treat non-whites who engage in similar behavior Empowerer Jan 2016 #50

These are "acceptable terrorists" apparently. valerief Jan 2016 #51

So not immediately escalating the situation is treating them as "acceptable"? cali Jan 2016 #61

This crap keeps happening because they do not believe that the Government will ever LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #53

I suspect if black men had done this they would already be dead Enthusiast Jan 2016 #65

Probably not, actually. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #69

This is how White Privilege works..... HipChick Jan 2016 #70

+1 nt steve2470 Jan 2016 #73

send in the drones! mwrguy Jan 2016 #71

black=thugs, brown=terrorists, white=protesters Skittles Jan 2016 #72

LOL malaise Jan 2016 #74

BACK AT YA BABE Skittles Jan 2016 #75