Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
1. As a UBC supporter, I particularly approve of that change in policy towards non-FFL sellers.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:29 PM
Jan 2016

I've thought the vague rules about who is required to have an FFL to continue selling guns needed to be reformed for quite a while now, even before the idea of expanding background checks became a point of discussion. There's a vast difference between a gun owner selling one or two guns that they no longer want and those guys who come to every gun show with a couple tables full of tactical gear and a bunch of guns from their "private connection." The latter are running a business. Even if it's a part-time income supplement, it's still a business and should be licensed accordingly. The fact that they'll be required to run a background check is icing on the cake.

This is also a step closer to universal background checks. The final step to achieve that goal will have to be taken by each state (we already have done this here in Oregon), but I expect a lot of states to do so. Some, obviously, never will...but we can still see progress.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama's EOs on ...»Reply #1