Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
15. .
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 02:39 PM
Jan 2016
http://www.landrights.org/or/Hammond/Hammonds%20Appeal%209th%20district%20court.pdf

The government appeals the sentences of Steven and
Dwight Hammond, whom a jury convicted of maliciously
damaging the real property of the United States by fire, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(f)(1). The convictions carried
minimum sentences of five years of imprisonment, but citing
Eighth Amendment concerns, the district court sentenced
Steven to only twelve months and one day of imprisonment
and Dwight to only three months of imprisonment. Because
the sentences were illegal and the government did not waive
its right to appeal them, we vacate the sentences and remand
for resentencing.

-----

Note that the Hammond's lawyers outnumbered the government:

COUNSEL

Kelly A. Zusman, Assistant United States Attorney; S.
Amanda Marshall, United States Attorney, District of
Oregon, Portland, Oregon, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Lawrence H. Matasar, Lawrence Matasar, P.C., Portland,
Oregon, for Defendant-Appellee Steven Dwight Hammond.

Marc D. Blackman and Kendra M. Matthews, Ransom &
Blackman, LLP, for Defendant-Appellee Dwight Lincoln
Hammond, Jr.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question about the Hammon...»Reply #15