Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
6. Thank you here is my comment:
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 04:50 PM
Jan 2016
We need the opposite of this job killing regulation gutting "agreement". Why should a foreign company reap
"anticipated" profits denied because of our environmental or safety regulations? They shouldn't and we should not
be required to change our regulations to enable a race to the bottom maximizing corporate profits at the expense
of Human health and lives.

Why should we bring disputes to packed tribunals judged by corporate lawyers?
We shouldn't it is merely an avenue to deny us access to judicial remedy.

This whole agreement negotiated in secret is an attempt to subvert the sovereignty of the USA and anyone
voting to agree to it should be charged with treason.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Comment Period On TPP Clo...»Reply #6