Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
171. By "weirder", you mean less able to dodge
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 01:40 PM
Jan 2016

No one is disputing that the non sequitur you posted is factually correct. It's merely a non sequitur, and does not address the original question, or refute my original assertions in any way.

And the fact that you have no clue about how logic works is not surprising.

See you.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The DNC Comes Full Circle [View all] Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 OP
K&R.... daleanime Jan 2016 #1
Wrong the DNC has many functions: and they are very important lewebley3 Jan 2016 #21
Please share their many functions with us. nm floriduck Jan 2016 #26
Why don't you crack a party History book: No time tutor lewebley3 Jan 2016 #28
Because you brought it up. So share floriduck Jan 2016 #30
Basically you don't have shit. Phlem Jan 2016 #32
Derails the thread pretty quickly though. merrily Jan 2016 #128
I do: you just don't agree with it: Your a Sander supporter lewebley3 Jan 2016 #190
uh huh. Phlem Jan 2016 #201
Let this be a lesson floriduck Jan 2016 #44
to Phlem and floriduck SCantiGOP Jan 2016 #50
Are you supporting the practice floriduck Jan 2016 #52
So you think that was hostile? LiberalLovinLug Jan 2016 #73
+ 1. nt hifiguy Jan 2016 #96
When Hillary fans criticize posts by Sanders fans, they should be willing to JDPriestly Jan 2016 #81
. . . hifiguy Jan 2016 #85
Nicely-stated, JDPriestly. K&R, nt. appal_jack Jan 2016 #88
Ouch. But it's what I've watched in decades of Democratic evolution. We're a long way from libdem4life Jan 2016 #110
Don't Forget The Sock-Puppets Too billhicks76 Jan 2016 #132
As if Hillary fans don't insult Sanders supporters. Most vocal ones on DU do and they don't bother cui bono Jan 2016 #99
Bravo! Bravissimo!! hifiguy Jan 2016 #104
Enough is enough! cui bono Jan 2016 #112
Zero evidence that Ghandi said that. merrily Jan 2016 #129
Gahndi's quote SCantiGOP Jan 2016 #147
What part of There's zero evidence that Ghandi ever said that was unclear? merrily Jan 2016 #148
You really need to change your screen name SCantiGOP Jan 2016 #152
My posts are nothing compared to the posts of Hillary supporters, including you. merrily Jan 2016 #153
Are you talking to a mirror? jeff47 Jan 2016 #176
WTF is this? Phlem Jan 2016 #175
I could care less what you think. Phlem Jan 2016 #174
No you just don't agree with me: You start with what you want to believe, lewebley3 Jan 2016 #188
Your syntax is, let us call it "interesting." hifiguy Jan 2016 #195
Checkmate: have a nice day lewebley3 Jan 2016 #197
Whose people in the world? !! ? DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #198
The OP clearly describes the Party's history since 1980, actually maybe 1968 JDPriestly Jan 2016 #80
LOL! Party history book. LOL! The hits keep coming. merrily Jan 2016 #127
apparently, you have time to assert things without backing them up virtualobserver Jan 2016 #179
I can assert and I do: I and I do it with education: some lewebley3 Jan 2016 #183
you don't provide us with any actual information....assertion requires no education virtualobserver Jan 2016 #184
Performance art hits all time high.... daleanime Jan 2016 #27
... AzDar Jan 2016 #49
Blammo. hifiguy Jan 2016 #65
If that's the all-time high, I am not optimistic about the future of performance art. merrily Jan 2016 #130
ummm did ya know the dnc was supposed to be giving bernie a level playing field ? questionseverything Jan 2016 #29
Oh lovely. "The DNC is standing up against Sanders bullies" madfloridian Jan 2016 #31
Standing up against Sanders supporters is against the very purpose of the DNC. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #45
Sander's Bullies Beowulf42 Jan 2016 #77
Good grief... gregcrawford Jan 2016 #78
What Bullshit sonofspy777 Jan 2016 #84
Hi, how is it going, Debbie? roody Jan 2016 #90
She won't answer you. She isn't listening and doesn't care. erronis Jan 2016 #118
The DNC sold out to the big corporations. Then no longer represent the grassroots Democrats. rhett o rick Jan 2016 #93
"side with the Aristocrats against the middle and working classes" Yallow Jan 2016 #105
LOL. hay rick Jan 2016 #108
Can't help you Sanders people have a blind spot lewebley3 Jan 2016 #196
"The DNC is standing up against Sanders bullies" Cassiopeia Jan 2016 #114
The DNC is standing up for millons of Dem's that don't want Sanders lewebley3 Jan 2016 #194
Shouldn't the DNC stand up for ALL Democrats? Cassiopeia Jan 2016 #206
You know if the DNC was doing the job they should be doing kacekwl Jan 2016 #120
Because they are too afraid Ruch Bimboo will get on the radio and criticize them mdbl Jan 2016 #142
Wrong: elections are run brave individual who mostly still lewebley3 Jan 2016 #193
Lol...Good One billhicks76 Jan 2016 #131
Unfortunately but true: I like to think the GOP are the only bullies lewebley3 Jan 2016 #181
And some Democrats who don't agree with Sanders lewebley3 Jan 2016 #186
Yes...they are much tougher on democrats and progressives noiretextatique Jan 2016 #172
They feel tougher because you are losing: it hurts to lose lewebley3 Jan 2016 #192
Which of course explains the massive losses hifiguy Jan 2016 #199
+1000 hobbit709 Jan 2016 #2
THIS!!!! nt antigop Jan 2016 #3
*tenet* IDemo Jan 2016 #4
Thank you. Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #5
kick shanti Jan 2016 #6
"So, the DNC managed to sell their souls, and ours, for nothing." No, they got something. Scuba Jan 2016 #7
True, Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #8
The DNC has not sold its sold to anyone: Sanders is a loser lewebley3 Jan 2016 #23
Clinton is loser and completely right wing. Phlem Jan 2016 #33
moore flaim bate... passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #79
Weren't Those Trumps Words? billhicks76 Jan 2016 #134
Except: Trump uses the word loser as meaning less place holder. lewebley3 Jan 2016 #169
Mean Less? billhicks76 Jan 2016 #182
Trump use's " loser": like people use the word Ah: when they can't lewebley3 Jan 2016 #185
"Follow the money." Deep Throat, aka Mark Felt merrily Jan 2016 #133
K&R! Down with 3rd Way. Katashi_itto Jan 2016 #9
Down with bulling the the DNC lewebley3 Jan 2016 #24
Blah bla blah blah blah. Phlem Jan 2016 #34
More like dorkzilla Jan 2016 #59
Do you realize that you come across as a troll? immoderate Jan 2016 #62
Doesn't seem to be bothered by how he, she or they come across. merrily Jan 2016 #135
Yes, as Dem: not a socialist supporter lewebley3 Jan 2016 #189
But if a majority voted for socialism, would you support them? immoderate Jan 2016 #191
mission accomplished librechik Jan 2016 #10
Call the DNC 202 863 8000! zentrum Jan 2016 #11
I'm sorry, do you think that individuals Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #13
Not so. zentrum Jan 2016 #18
Don't look now but the agitation Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #22
...! KoKo Jan 2016 #58
Not so. No one was more active than liberals. No. One. merrily Jan 2016 #136
Pelosi is happy with her. So is Obama. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #53
Have I been asleep? Paka Jan 2016 #89
Me either. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #119
I've done that already, but for those who haven't, it's a good idea. Duval Jan 2016 #71
K&R! Omaha Steve Jan 2016 #12
So the DNC is to blame for Democrats losing congressional support... ConservativeDemocrat Jan 2016 #14
As stated in the OP, Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #16
Ah, the old compare it to your dreams of magical rainbows and unicorn-farts method ConservativeDemocrat Jan 2016 #40
So, this just got real juvenile real fast. Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #42
Translation: your conspiracy theorizing got called out ConservativeDemocrat Jan 2016 #56
"Sanderistas" "hard left?" bread_and_roses Jan 2016 #60
Bernie sounds exactly like Hubert Humphrey, LBJ and all the Kennedy brothers. hifiguy Jan 2016 #66
Humphrey, LBJ, and the Kennedys campaigned as socialists? ConservativeDemocrat Jan 2016 #74
Try looking at the POLICIES they proposed hifiguy Jan 2016 #75
Okay, sure ConservativeDemocrat Jan 2016 #82
In a different time in america sprts Jan 2016 #123
JFK said 1939 Jan 2016 #140
Who is campaigning as a socialist? cui bono Jan 2016 #95
You're unwilling to acknowledge what your own candidate says? ConservativeDemocrat Jan 2016 #121
No, I'm not. So who's running as a socialist? cui bono Jan 2016 #124
U should read a little history yourself sprts Jan 2016 #126
"And you might want to lose the condescending attitude" BeanMusical Jan 2016 #168
Alert results, 4-3 to keep stevenleser Jan 2016 #113
One insulting post after another. Gag. merrily Jan 2016 #139
You claim Dem losses in 2010 and 2014 were typical and backing a New Deal Dem is hard left-- merrily Jan 2016 #138
Losses and losses are two different things: Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #162
Umm you do realize that your moniker sonofspy777 Jan 2016 #87
No. It's not. ConservativeDemocrat Jan 2016 #122
Poster, please. 16% is more than 29%? Did you really expect to get away with that? merrily Jan 2016 #141
Try again... ConservativeDemocrat Jan 2016 #154
No need to try again. My post was correct. Yours was not. merrily Jan 2016 #155
Mine was not? ConservativeDemocrat Jan 2016 #157
MY non sequiturs? LOL merrily Jan 2016 #159
Your refusal to provide evidence is noted... ConservativeDemocrat Jan 2016 #161
Evidence of what? The numbers in my post are right off the chart you posted. It's not rocket science merrily Jan 2016 #163
Evidence that anything I said was not correct ConservativeDemocrat Jan 2016 #165
Reply 141 points out your error. The chart YOU posted is evidence that Reply 141 is correct. merrily Jan 2016 #167
By "weirder", you mean less able to dodge ConservativeDemocrat Jan 2016 #171
2014 losses--local, state and federal--were historic, not business as usual. merrily Jan 2016 #137
that's long been the predictable/predicted outcome stupidicus Jan 2016 #15
Re your last paragraph. Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #17
it's been inevitable stupidicus Jan 2016 #158
Awesome post Tsiyu Jan 2016 #19
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Jan 2016 #20
its is clear they are working for the 1% not us restorefreedom Jan 2016 #25
Voter since JFK and that is also the way I see it. We are not jwirr Jan 2016 #83
i am sure many of us restorefreedom Jan 2016 #91
Exactly. jwirr Jan 2016 #92
Good news! You don't have to worry about the TPP vote. jeff47 Jan 2016 #178
That is what I was afraid of. We have a very broken government. jwirr Jan 2016 #187
K&R!!!! Phlem Jan 2016 #35
Wasn't for nothing: We the 99-percent of the People are farther behind than ever. Octafish Jan 2016 #36
The progressives (not to be confused with Democrats) Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #39
That is so. Octafish Jan 2016 #41
We're called the Teabaggers of the left in this OP! cui bono Jan 2016 #97
LOL! Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #98
I really need to start an ignore list. cui bono Jan 2016 #100
You're a bigger person than I am, cui bono. Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #111
Oh, I don't know about that! cui bono Jan 2016 #125
Proof that there are some very dull knives hifiguy Jan 2016 #103
Kick azmom Jan 2016 #37
Total K & R! SoapBox Jan 2016 #38
A thousand times this. hifiguy Jan 2016 #67
K&R! This post deserves hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Jan 2016 #43
there is something about Debby azureblue Jan 2016 #46
+1! Enthusiast Jan 2016 #47
Exactly, "like a Mole"! Duppers Jan 2016 #63
This message was self-deleted by its author tabasco Jan 2016 #48
Looking like 3rd way Democrats would rather see moderate republicans in office than liberal Dems.. raindaddy Jan 2016 #51
And if Web enters the GE campaign as an Independent, I believe Hillary will flip flop back Right to DhhD Jan 2016 #116
I bet you're right.. raindaddy Jan 2016 #117
Oh Fuck Le Taz! Trajan Jan 2016 #54
LOL! Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #55
maybe if D W-S wasn't buisy killing off all the progressives she could hollysmom Jan 2016 #57
Great Post and observation Ichingcarpenter Jan 2016 #61
Over and over hifiguy Jan 2016 #68
Debbie doesn't do Dallas anymore? I'm laughing at Duval Jan 2016 #70
She's still employed for one reason. hifiguy Jan 2016 #64
Poor people can't contribute enough to get someone elected... Ivan Kaputski Jan 2016 #69
K&R and thanks!! Duval Jan 2016 #72
I pray that the majority of Democrats Utopian Leftist Jan 2016 #76
"once in a lifetime opportunity to vote for real change" Yallow Jan 2016 #107
K&R Paka Jan 2016 #86
Cue Bernie getting the blame for lack of fundraising since he doesn't take Super Pac money. cui bono Jan 2016 #94
K&R CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #101
Have you ever attended a state convention and voted for DNC member? Gothmog Jan 2016 #102
Yes, I was an Executive Board Member Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #109
Well said! emsimon33 Jan 2016 #106
What top Democratic consultant has been suffering under DWS? Babel_17 Jan 2016 #115
While we were all chortling about the upcoming demographic demise of the GOP tularetom Jan 2016 #143
And DWS's recent rant Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #145
My prediction jeff47 Jan 2016 #180
K&R The #1 concern is obviously the money continuing to flow. raouldukelives Jan 2016 #144
I heard that someone was prmarying her n/t eridani Jan 2016 #146
AND THE BEAT GOES ON!!! ChiciB1 Jan 2016 #149
Excellent! ccinamon Jan 2016 #150
We get the DNC we vote for. Most people don't bother paying attention, and so we get bad people. Chathamization Jan 2016 #151
Actually, "we" don't get a vote Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #164
The rank and file Democrats get to vote for the DNC members though. Most people ignore this, true Chathamization Jan 2016 #200
Now we're talking membership? Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #202
Eh? I'm talking about DNC committee members. The ones who choose the chair. Most of these people Chathamization Jan 2016 #203
And a third movement of the goal posts. Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #204
Not sure if you've been purposefully misreading my posts or are just very confused about the DNC Chathamization Jan 2016 #205
Yeah, I'm new to this politics thing. Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #207
This was the goal of the DLC from the beginning Doctor_J Jan 2016 #156
Excellent observation. eom Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #160
K&R! n/t Kermitt Gribble Jan 2016 #166
The 2nd listed post: "Wrong. The DNC has many functions" does not seem to fit with the TryLogic Jan 2016 #170
Sad to see Jesus Malverde Jan 2016 #173
Kickin' Faux pas Jan 2016 #177
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The DNC Comes Full Circle»Reply #171