Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
20. Thanks for posting. I also have a link to the Buffalo News talking with the foreman
Thu May 31, 2012, 09:19 PM
May 2012
http://www.buffalonews.com/topics/dr-james-corasanti-trial/article881178.ece

Unlike my evidence post in the original thread, I am going to biased as hell here.

The things that struck me from the conversation were the following four things:

The jury thought Corasanti "seemed nice"....what the hell.

The defense expert witness was "more professional" then the police crime scene investigators in reconstructing the accident. Again, "more professional"? That means what exactly?

Finally, the jury had reasonable doubt the doctor could hear the impact inside his BMW Series 7, because the defense could not show how loud the hit would have been. As the DA said after the case, "It is a car not a tank."

Also, the doctor wouldn't have noticed his car's front end had crumpled 8 inches and a mirror had been ripped off, because the jury walked behind the car (did not sit in it, mind you), and he couldn't see the damage looking through the rear windshield. Apparently, the foreman felt being behind the car would mirror what the driver sees.

OK, five things. It is nice to hear the jury bonded during the "grueling trial".

I am not a happy Buffalonian tonight.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Jesus. H. Christ. WTF??? "Panicking" is now a defense? - n/t coalition_unwilling May 2012 #1
It goes to the defendant's mental state. former9thward May 2012 #9
who *doesn't* panic if they have an accident? i've had three, none terribly serious, and i went HiPointDem May 2012 #22
The prosecution must prove intent. former9thward Jun 2012 #30
The Dick Cheney defense: "I was so upset, I went home and had a drink...." rfranklin May 2012 #2
Exactly! Wonder why the jury members didn't get that? SammyWinstonJack May 2012 #6
I hope Alix's family goes for a wrongful death lawsuit. This man should at least lose a lot of Booster May 2012 #3
This is a virtual slam dunk civil suit. hifiguy May 2012 #8
Hell, he'll probably plead guilty in a civil suit. Money means nothing to him. Booster May 2012 #12
Defendants don't enter pleas in civil suits like the do in hifiguy May 2012 #14
If a civil suit is filed, can he make a deal before it even goes to trial? Booster May 2012 #15
Oh, certainly. hifiguy May 2012 #16
Then if he's smart he'll do that. Booster May 2012 #18
He panicked because the force of the impact JBoy May 2012 #4
I guess the Doctor was tried by a jury of his peers: evil idiots. libinnyandia May 2012 #5
"we had to put some of the fault on Alix" alcibiades_mystery May 2012 #7
Jesus Wept, Sir The Magistrate May 2012 #10
Right. H2O Man May 2012 #13
Indeed, Sir: In This Matter, The Panicking Is The Crime The Magistrate May 2012 #19
I hope the girl's family leaves the doctor virtually broke and homeless. nt Ilsa May 2012 #11
Dafuq??? Odin2005 May 2012 #17
So stealing that. nt msanthrope May 2012 #24
Thanks for posting. I also have a link to the Buffalo News talking with the foreman Godhumor May 2012 #20
I confess, things like this fill me with such a despair I want to drink myself blind. Rittermeister May 2012 #21
Well, I hate to say I was right...but in the last thread, I did tell you msanthrope May 2012 #25
You're absolutely right, of course Godhumor May 2012 #26
Happens all the time. nt msanthrope May 2012 #28
It's the OJ jury redux. nt msanthrope May 2012 #23
OJ Jury at least had lead detective wanting to burn black people alive... uponit7771 May 2012 #29
WTF who instructed this jury........ Historic NY May 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jury foreman: Dr acquitte...»Reply #20