Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Injuries soar after Michigan stops requiring motorcycle helmets [View all]Staph
(6,467 posts)22. Could it have anything to do with
the state's Republican governor, state Senate and state House of Representatives?
The (helmet) law was written with input from ABATE, a motorcycle association dedicated to improving motorcycle safety and car driver awareness of motorcyclists on the roads. The new law gives Michigan the strictest requirements for riding helmet-free of any state that has modified mandatory helmet laws for adult choice (30 states). Allowing motorcyclists to ride helmet-free could also generate more than $1 billion in direct and indirect revenue, according to a recent Michigan Consultants study.
The problem is, helmet laws have done nothing to improve safety or reduce fatalities or the cost of insurance, said Vince Consiglio, President of ABATE of Michigan. Motorcycle accidents are a very small percentage of accidents overall. Data from other states demonstrate that states that remove mandatory helmet laws do not see an increase in insurance premiums, and states that institute helmet laws do not see a corresponding decrease in insurance rates. Its never happened. In addition, the leading insurance lobbyist was videotaped testifying before a senate committee last session saying that residents in Michigan will NOT see any rate increase as a result of the passage of this bill. This is yet another reason that we garnered such a large support base from the Michigan legislature.
The problem is, helmet laws have done nothing to improve safety or reduce fatalities or the cost of insurance, said Vince Consiglio, President of ABATE of Michigan. Motorcycle accidents are a very small percentage of accidents overall. Data from other states demonstrate that states that remove mandatory helmet laws do not see an increase in insurance premiums, and states that institute helmet laws do not see a corresponding decrease in insurance rates. Its never happened. In addition, the leading insurance lobbyist was videotaped testifying before a senate committee last session saying that residents in Michigan will NOT see any rate increase as a result of the passage of this bill. This is yet another reason that we garnered such a large support base from the Michigan legislature.
http://www.abateofmichigan.org/Michigan'sHelmetChoiceLaw.htm
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
May I borrow that BLM logo to add to my posts? (I'll remove it if it isn't OK.) nt
tblue37
Jan 2016
#56
I beileve that one of the arguments used to repeal the helmet law in Arkansas
Art_from_Ark
Jan 2016
#28
When some dufus turns in front of my bike while texting and I AM I wearing a helmet...
cherokeeprogressive
Jan 2016
#60