Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Guns are tightly restricted on US military bases -- would Trump change that? [View all]Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)12. If the argument is meant as an idea towards warding off rampage shooters
Ft Hood, recruiting offices and the Naval Yard shootings would seem to challenge the underlying assumptions.
In fact, after the recent terrorist attacks on the recruiting offices many have petitioned that service members not be disarmed. One officer faced court martial for going to his car to retrieve his personal weapon. Several state governors have allowed select full time National Guard troops to carry on duty.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Guns are tightly restricted on US military bases -- would Trump change that? [View all]
Akamai
Jan 2016
OP
McCrhystal was talking about the bullets themselves -- not the automatic firing capabilities.
Akamai
Jan 2016
#10
The 5.56mm round the M4 and M16 fire is so SMALL, troops complained in Afghanistan about it
NickB79
Jan 2016
#23
I see gunners are here correcting nomenclature - - auto vs semiautomatic - as if a semi-auto can't
Hoyt
Jan 2016
#3
Semi-auto are deadly enough. I bet you've checked out what is involved. Here's a trick.
Hoyt
Jan 2016
#30
Yahoos don't need fully automatic weapons to kill a lot of folks, intimidate folks, play
Hoyt
Jan 2016
#37
The policy is in place because guns and ammo ended up at gun shows in the early 90's.
X_Digger
Jan 2016
#6
If the argument is meant as an idea towards warding off rampage shooters
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#12
I would let them make the changes they feel they need to make and can lawfully make.
Akamai
Jan 2016
#21
While what you say is true I don't see it as germane to discussion about regulations
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#25
A real problem is generalizing from single instances -- military leaders are much more likely to be
Akamai
Jan 2016
#26
While military leaders can and do offer advice on the writing of military regulations
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#27
Memory doesn't serve you accurately in this instance. The regs were written during the preceding
Akamai
Jan 2016
#36
Glad to see you understand that allowing more gunz loose on base is a LOWER standard.
Hoyt
Jan 2016
#33