So how would you amend the constitution?

[Algernon Moncrieff]

66. I respect that

I realize that these are often thought of as conservative positions.

As to term limits: my basic problem is that reps and senators of both parties tend to become increasingly beholden to special interests the longer they stay in office. Also, I think term limits would force both parties to let in more fresh thinkers. I don't think 18 year limits in congress is an odious limit.

My reasoning for the SCOTUS is a little different. Right now, both parties game the system by finding the youngest jurist they can credibly put on the court to maximize the impact of the pick. Older, more experienced jurists (either serving judges or those in academia) are often overlooked.

I realize the downside if a line item veto in the wrong hands. However, in he current political climate, it's the only realistic way I can see to get boondoggles like the F35 off the books.