Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Wearing unearned medals is protected by 1st Amendment, appeals court rules [View all]ronnie624
(5,764 posts)78. I'm thankful I was not old enough to serve,
because being young, gullible and easily intimidated, I would have doubtless gone along and helped in the slaughter of the Indochinese peoples and the decimation of their countries, just like most of the other young men who were drafted. I know myself well enough to be certain, however, that I would have never been proud of what I had done.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Wearing unearned medals is protected by 1st Amendment, appeals court rules [View all]
Liberal_in_LA
Jan 2016
OP
I understand your anger, but I think criminalizing the wearing of fake medals went too far.
NutmegYankee
Jan 2016
#11
The defendant claimed: Silver Star, Purple Heart, Navy & Marine Corps Medal with Gold Star, & more
Liberal_in_LA
Jan 2016
#12
I think people who wear unearned medals are a tad nuts. Just a little off---and I'm serious.
virgogal
Jan 2016
#33
I'm sure it's taken seriously, but one of the things vets fight to defend is the Constitution and
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2016
#55
No, I'm just trying to brainstorm some way to respect the vets clear wishes on this matter while
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2016
#62
Then you raise the potential for a Soviet-style Stripping of Decorations scenario
jmowreader
Jan 2016
#82
Then approbation will have to do, because the 1st Amendment protects the right of people to do this.
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2016
#83
Ok, you're right, it's just that every medal I earned and was awarded, I did it honestly
GGJohn
Jan 2016
#58
Any asshole can wander around with a medal they "say" they earned, even if it is lie...
madinmaryland
Jan 2016
#7
I blew my chance at the Good Conduct about 5 months before I was eligible for it.
hobbit709
Jan 2016
#18
The First Amendment protects stuff that is repugnant as well as stuff that we all agree with.
Nye Bevan
Jan 2016
#19
Popular speech needs no protection- by definition. Much as I hate it in this case, I agree. n/t
X_Digger
Jan 2016
#24
Probably not, but ridiculing them on Youtube is probably even more effective:
Nye Bevan
Jan 2016
#42
Simple fact is, the 1st Amendment protects your right to be a lying sack of shit.
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2016
#53
Good ruling. Everytime they pass one of those laws that elevate one type of citizen above another
CBGLuthier
Jan 2016
#61
A medal is an award. It is the expressed opinion of an authorized body that determines whether
Monk06
Jan 2016
#66
Well first I'm not angry. I'm a Canadian and this has no effect on me at all. I just think the
Monk06
Jan 2016
#107
"Well, it's not my fault you didn't check my background whether I'm a real doctor."
DetlefK
Jan 2016
#90