General Discussion

stuffmatters

(2,580 posts)

74. Canova:Anti-TPP, private prisons, pro medical marijuana, pro Glass Steagall

Tue Jan 12, 2016, 05:06 PM

Jan 2016

He has immensely popular Dem positions. Just add scrapping the soc sec cap to insure the solvency of soc sec for future generations/grandkids, and Canova has a winning platform ag DWS. Even if her district (as described above) leans toward an older demographic. Yes older, but the D's are still D's by choice and orientation.

D W-Schultz's track/voting record is completely opposite from what Canova stands for.

I especially appreciate Canova putting explanation and opposition for TPP front and center There's only a little while longer before Congress votes to pass it fast track. This should be a loud and central theme of every Democrat running for worker, environmental, health, financial protections and defending our Democracy against corporate omnipotence.

I'm happy to donate to Canova. He represents the issues I want a Democratic candidate to represent.

DWS simply does not "represent". As Chair of the DNC, she is a contradiction of what to me our Party stands for. She's proven an incompetent strategist and now is a debilitating messenger for the Democratic Party.

.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

80 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why I'm running against Debbie Wasserman-Schultz [View all] cali Jan 2016 OP

Donate to DU for Tim here Omaha Steve Jan 2016 #1

Thanks, Steve! I'll donate immediatly after this rant... Elmer S. E. Dump Jan 2016 #14

We have raised $95 since I made that post Omaha Steve Jan 2016 #16

Steve, remind us on Friday (payday), please. :) n/t Turn CO Blue Jan 2016 #73

I Can't Afford To Donate Anymore $$ Right Now... ChiciB1 Jan 2016 #2

Canova sounds great, thanks for the link. emulatorloo Jan 2016 #3

Thanks Cali. Cassiopeia Jan 2016 #4

That's one way to fire DWS. jhart3333 Jan 2016 #5

His chances are slim to none running on that platform in that district. eom MohRokTah Jan 2016 #6

Ah yes. The old inevitable argument. jhart3333 Jan 2016 #8

It's a demographic argument. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #11

And they must just love that she doesn't want to tax Wall Street speculation the way Bernie does... cascadiance Jan 2016 #15

Most people in this demographic don't buy into the rhetoric you are using. eom MohRokTah Jan 2016 #18

Then I guess they didn't think Wall Street needed a bailout since it was doing so nicely... cascadiance Jan 2016 #20

Nore rhetoric they won't buy into. eom MohRokTah Jan 2016 #21

Maybe corporatists won't, but most people aren't the 1%. That's why they are called the ONE percent cascadiance Jan 2016 #47

Gloat while you can. You have the billionaires on your side, but sooner or later the People rhett o rick Jan 2016 #48

Are you their spokesperson? n/t brentspeak Jan 2016 #37

Sounds like it. n/t BeanMusical Jan 2016 #63

And that will continue as long as craven politicians tell them only what they already believe. Jim Lane Jan 2016 #69

You might be right...none of his DU donations are from FL (yet) Omaha Steve Jan 2016 #31

That's because we Floridians already knew about him Lorien Jan 2016 #77

Oh sure,...telling older people you are going to expand Social Security is a real loser. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #44

What was the 2014 turnout in her district? How many disaffected are needed to tip the scales? Scuba Jan 2016 #61

Remember when Bill ran on fire Bush and won Omaha Steve Jan 2016 #10

That's not good argument in that district. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #12

In 2007 i had people here tell me pot legalization was a non issue, no state would EVER legalize it. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #22

In 2007, pot legalization WAS a non-issue. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #23

You understand what the word "never" means, right? Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #25

The way to relate to millenials is to have core beliefs that govern how you act as a politician. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #33

Remember when her advisers were talking about their "new rollout of authenticity and spontaneity"? Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #41

They have planned spontaneity :-) :-). Indeed, you can't make this shit up. n/t JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #43

Doesn't matter. I am sure DWS has her sights on bigger things. I bet she is hoping that rhett o rick Jan 2016 #49

It was those of us who refused to listen to people like you who MADE it-- eridani Jan 2016 #60

He sounds like a great candidate. JDPriestly Jan 2016 #7

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #9

I live in Washington and was more than happy..... Capt.Rocky300 Jan 2016 #13

I'm in California Plucketeer Jan 2016 #26

I live in California as well and rather than donate, I'm buying a few votes in her district. nt cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #30

thank you Tim Canova n/t zazen Jan 2016 #17

KICK AND REC Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #19

I just tossed a little in the kitty. eom Snotcicles Jan 2016 #24

Tim Canova 2024 Kalidurga Jan 2016 #27

He will lose. RandySF Jan 2016 #28

When are the findings from the investigation that Sanders ask for on the DNC due out? He will win. DhhD Jan 2016 #32

Bernie Sanders is going to win Aerows Jan 2016 #36

I think DhhD meant that if Sanders' report on the contract breach by DWS is out Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #53

I don't care who wins Aerows Jan 2016 #34

Floridians deserve better. She supported her local republicans. roody Jan 2016 #46

The DNC deserves better too. n/t progressoid Jan 2016 #50

Absolutely, roody Aerows Jan 2016 #51

Wishful thinking? Do you actually oppose him? JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #35

He won't admit to that tkmorris Jan 2016 #67

... BeanMusical Jan 2016 #64

Thank you Tim creatives4innovation Jan 2016 #29

K&R! RiffRandell Jan 2016 #38

And so it begins Babel_17 Jan 2016 #39

Wow! Thanks, cali. Let the donations begin. Duval Jan 2016 #40

She feels she's protected by the Clintons,....who OWN the party. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #42

And may be soon disowned by that same party? Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #54

That's why endorsements by what they consider to be "the in crowd" don't impress me. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #55

Exactly. The in-group sticks together. senz Jan 2016 #58

That last sentence. Octafish Jan 2016 #45

The solution is primarying the problem. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #52

Dear Tim, why I think your campaign is doomed anigbrowl Jan 2016 #56

There is no "obsessive dislike" in his article, just clearly stated policy positions. senz Jan 2016 #57

Oh really? anigbrowl Jan 2016 #59

Really. senz Jan 2016 #76

Not really. There is nothing silly about my question anigbrowl Jan 2016 #80

... Scuba Jan 2016 #62

If a pro baseball player put up those kind of stats, even in the minors, hifiguy Jan 2016 #75

I'm not sure how this meme is right ISUGRADIA Jan 2016 #78

K&R! I would love to see this receive hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Jan 2016 #65

k and r...thanks for posting...!!!! Stuart G Jan 2016 #66

Recommend (#200) H2O Man Jan 2016 #68

K & R ! n/t xocet Jan 2016 #70

Just kicked in for Tim Canova. GoneFishin Jan 2016 #71

Any reason will do. Just get her out of office. Florida has more than it's share of dino's. Ivan Kaputski Jan 2016 #72

Canova:Anti-TPP, private prisons, pro medical marijuana, pro Glass Steagall stuffmatters Jan 2016 #74

K&R! blackspade Jan 2016 #79