Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Coventina

(29,730 posts)
22. That is survival, not being an "asshole".
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:05 PM
Jan 2016

They kill (or drive away) the weak for the good of the pack.

The rolling in shit is to disguise their scent while hunting. Although, since evolution has taught them to seek out and love that aroma, they will sometime do it recreationally, to the dismay of dog owners.


Anyway, the bottom line is that Nature is often unkind, and breeds unkind behaviors in many species. We are one of the few who have evolved to recognize and value altruism. But we're a looooong way of making that a common goal for our species.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sadly, I think nothing gets done. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #1
We're an incredibly stupid species, aren't we? deutsey Jan 2016 #2
Yes, we are. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #3
I disagree atreides1 Jan 2016 #7
Clarifying tazkcmo Jan 2016 #8
Nah. Dogs abandon their runts, kill their weak and roll in shit Orrex Jan 2016 #13
That is survival, not being an "asshole". Coventina Jan 2016 #22
Well, try doing those things the next time you're at the movies Orrex Jan 2016 #25
Well, what dogs have evolved to do for survival and we have evolved for survival is different. Coventina Jan 2016 #27
Very true, but consider: Orrex Jan 2016 #29
Oh I agree with you. No species is inherently noble. Although some are more cut-throat than others Coventina Jan 2016 #31
Saint Reagan Protalker Jan 2016 #5
To be fair, I'm pretty sure that he mentioned it before that Orrex Jan 2016 #26
The US response to Ebola was fantastic compared to the US response to AIDS in the 80's. 40,000 Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #9
Reagan and his ilk were more than just stupid when it came to AIDS deutsey Jan 2016 #12
Micturate, trickle down economics Protalker Jan 2016 #34
Obama ordered the military to respond before the man who brought ebola to the US karynnj Jan 2016 #32
I'm referring to how this was allowed to become a crisis by the world community deutsey Jan 2016 #33
Well, if there are two million ISIS members, is there a way to bait them all behind the dam? snooper2 Jan 2016 #15
IIRC this is the dam they have to pour concrete into daily underpants Jan 2016 #4
Funny how we think we can control water liberal N proud Jan 2016 #6
I wonder where infrastructure reinvestment figures on the caliphate's priority list BeyondGeography Jan 2016 #10
. . .nowhere unless god tells them personally, I suppose. . .n/t annabanana Jan 2016 #11
Yeah, time for Daesh to step up and prove it is a real government. Coventina Jan 2016 #19
Great article, eridani. Hussein ("a madman") and other dictators tend to get what they want, pampango Jan 2016 #14
I would love to see the specs on the dam that they build downstream Orrex Jan 2016 #16
I would think the plan is to build dam two dsc Jan 2016 #20
I would hope so, but might that not take years? Orrex Jan 2016 #21
An acquaintance of mine returned to Iran... meaculpa2011 Jan 2016 #17
"New dam" ?? WTF ? Draw the old dam's reservoir down ASAP !! eppur_se_muova Jan 2016 #18
That's what I'm thinking. But I think ISIL controls Mosul, or closeupready Jan 2016 #23
Nutbag zealotry trumps rational thought, including engineering considerations. nt eppur_se_muova Jan 2016 #30
two things EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #28
We have experience with dams built on substandard substrate: IDemo Jan 2016 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Worse Than Isis. Mosul da...»Reply #22