Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
33. I'm referring to how this was allowed to become a crisis by the world community
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 02:18 PM
Jan 2016

The US included.

There have been outbreaks before and mobilizations have responded quickly to contain them.

I was reading about this outbreak and how bad it was long before I remember it being mentioned in mainstream media in any significant way in the US.

There were many reasons for the outbreak spiraling out of control, from the lack of a modern healthcare infrastructure in that part of Africa, deforestation which has brought humans and diseased bats together, budget cuts at WHO, etc.

Or, in a word, given the deadly and highly contagious nature of the disease, stupidity on our part. We know how horrific and dangerous this disease is, and yet we cut budgets, deforest the land for a slimy buck, etc.

From the Washington Post:

So how did the situation get so horribly out of control?

The virus easily outran the plodding response. The WHO, an arm of the United Nations, is responsible for coordinating international action in a crisis like this, but it has suffered budget cuts, has lost many of its brightest minds and was slow to sound a global alarm on Ebola. Not until Aug. 8, 4 1 ⁄ 2 months into the epidemic, did the organization declare a global emergency. Its Africa office, which oversees the region, initially did not welcome a robust role by the CDC in the response to the outbreak.

Previous Ebola outbreaks had been quickly throttled, but that experience proved misleading and officials did not grasp the potential scale of the disaster. Their imaginations were unequal to the virulence of the pathogen.

"In retrospect, we could have responded faster. Some of the criticism is appropriate," acknowledged Richard Brennan, director of the WHO's Department of Emergency Risk Management and Humanitarian Response. But he added, "While some of the criticism we accept, I think we also have to get things in perspective that this outbreak has a dynamic that's unlike everything we've ever seen before and, I think, has caught everyone unawares."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2014/10/04/how-ebola-sped-out-of-control/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sadly, I think nothing gets done. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #1
We're an incredibly stupid species, aren't we? deutsey Jan 2016 #2
Yes, we are. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #3
I disagree atreides1 Jan 2016 #7
Clarifying tazkcmo Jan 2016 #8
Nah. Dogs abandon their runts, kill their weak and roll in shit Orrex Jan 2016 #13
That is survival, not being an "asshole". Coventina Jan 2016 #22
Well, try doing those things the next time you're at the movies Orrex Jan 2016 #25
Well, what dogs have evolved to do for survival and we have evolved for survival is different. Coventina Jan 2016 #27
Very true, but consider: Orrex Jan 2016 #29
Oh I agree with you. No species is inherently noble. Although some are more cut-throat than others Coventina Jan 2016 #31
Saint Reagan Protalker Jan 2016 #5
To be fair, I'm pretty sure that he mentioned it before that Orrex Jan 2016 #26
The US response to Ebola was fantastic compared to the US response to AIDS in the 80's. 40,000 Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #9
Reagan and his ilk were more than just stupid when it came to AIDS deutsey Jan 2016 #12
Micturate, trickle down economics Protalker Jan 2016 #34
Obama ordered the military to respond before the man who brought ebola to the US karynnj Jan 2016 #32
I'm referring to how this was allowed to become a crisis by the world community deutsey Jan 2016 #33
Well, if there are two million ISIS members, is there a way to bait them all behind the dam? snooper2 Jan 2016 #15
IIRC this is the dam they have to pour concrete into daily underpants Jan 2016 #4
Funny how we think we can control water liberal N proud Jan 2016 #6
I wonder where infrastructure reinvestment figures on the caliphate's priority list BeyondGeography Jan 2016 #10
. . .nowhere unless god tells them personally, I suppose. . .n/t annabanana Jan 2016 #11
Yeah, time for Daesh to step up and prove it is a real government. Coventina Jan 2016 #19
Great article, eridani. Hussein ("a madman") and other dictators tend to get what they want, pampango Jan 2016 #14
I would love to see the specs on the dam that they build downstream Orrex Jan 2016 #16
I would think the plan is to build dam two dsc Jan 2016 #20
I would hope so, but might that not take years? Orrex Jan 2016 #21
An acquaintance of mine returned to Iran... meaculpa2011 Jan 2016 #17
"New dam" ?? WTF ? Draw the old dam's reservoir down ASAP !! eppur_se_muova Jan 2016 #18
That's what I'm thinking. But I think ISIL controls Mosul, or closeupready Jan 2016 #23
Nutbag zealotry trumps rational thought, including engineering considerations. nt eppur_se_muova Jan 2016 #30
two things EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #28
We have experience with dams built on substandard substrate: IDemo Jan 2016 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Worse Than Isis. Mosul da...»Reply #33