General Discussion

pnwmom

(110,263 posts) Wed Jan 13, 2016, 03:33 PM Jan 2016

Do Trump's supporters not care about his wife's Internet porn photos, [View all]

Last edited Wed Jan 13, 2016, 04:51 PM - Edit history (1)

are they unaware of them, or what?

And I'm not just talking about the one on the rug -- there are more, full frontal.

If our candidate runs against Trump, is this a fair issue to bring up? Or do we just pretend the photos don't exist because we're better than the Rethugs are, and why shouldn't a former porn star make a great First Lady?

P.S. Some of the nude photos included another beauty, too. I wonder what Kim Davis would think.

ON EDIT: And they're positioning her as the next Jackie Kennedy.

http://www.tampabay.com/incoming/shed-be-the-only-first-lady-to-have-posed-in-the-buff/2247950

"She provides great balance" to Trump, said Roger Stone, the candidate's former political adviser who has known the couple since before they were married. She is smart — "not just an armpiece," Stone said. "She would be the most glamourous first lady since Jackie Kennedy."

116 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Do Trump's supporters not care about his wife's Internet porn photos, [View all] pnwmom Jan 2016 OP

I was unaware of them. Was she in porn films or just photos? Vinca Jan 2016 #1

What I saw were still photos, but it is possible one was a pnwmom Jan 2016 #6

The ones I saw were of her posing in Trump's new jet. randr Jan 2016 #18

Don't think so, they are so tacky and hateful, they don't care about having any respect or decency! Yupy Jan 2016 #2

Perhaps this is Trump's idea of full disclosure? eom guillaumeb Jan 2016 #3

IOKIYAR nt WhiteTara Jan 2016 #4

Why should anyone care? jberryhill Jan 2016 #5

My question wasn't "why" it was more "whether." You think the party of pnwmom Jan 2016 #7

No I don't think they'd care jberryhill Jan 2016 #21

Or that Nancy was pregnant when they were married Lochloosa Jan 2016 #30

There you go again, HubertHeaver Jan 2016 #39

It's. a gift Lochloosa Jan 2016 #45

In medicine it's called Naegele's Rule. Manifestor_of_Light Jan 2016 #52

Ever hear of her nickname Mendocino Jan 2016 #41

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #77

Yep....nt Jesus Malverde Jan 2016 #86

Normal people shouldn't care, but for the religious right and to suddenly change their tune... Adenoid_Hynkel Jan 2016 #67

She doesn't have any internet porn pics cali Jan 2016 #8

What do you mean? They're on the Internet identified as her, pnwmom Jan 2016 #9

Link please cali Jan 2016 #10

No, I'm not referring to modeling pics. I think you'd have to pnwmom Jan 2016 #11

No,you don't have to be wearing clothes for them to be modeling pics. cali Jan 2016 #13

You don't think the photo of the woman pnwmom Jan 2016 #14

No one could tell. cali Jan 2016 #15

Not by her face? Do you think it's someone who looks just like her? pnwmom Jan 2016 #17

Google image search any female celebrity with the words porn or nude jberryhill Jan 2016 #53

I wonder why Trump doesn't sue the site, if the pictures are false. It's not like pnwmom Jan 2016 #55

Sue for what? jberryhill Jan 2016 #103

Defamation. If they photoshopped her head on someone else's porn photos pnwmom Jan 2016 #106

In what way is she being "defamed" jberryhill Jan 2016 #113

Yeah, spoken as the lawyer for the porn site. The lawyer for the Trumps pnwmom Jan 2016 #115

I don't know if they are fakes. xmas74 Jan 2016 #90

Your definition of porn is very strange...nt Jesus Malverde Jan 2016 #87

This is clearly a fake nude site. Photoshop. Nailzberg Jan 2016 #27

You don't get these images just by searching her name melman Jan 2016 #76

"They're on the Internet identified as her" jberryhill Jan 2016 #25

I agree cali. They are far from "porn" pics. Pick up any Cosmo and you'll see the same type of pic Lochloosa Jan 2016 #31

Going on what I presume to be the intelligence level of the average male Trumpenstein supporter DebbieCDC Jan 2016 #12

If I could I would show up at a Trump rally randr Jan 2016 #16

Really, why should ANYONE care? nt hifiguy Jan 2016 #19

Can you imagine their reaction if a Democratic First Lady had that background? pnwmom Jan 2016 #22

No, I am in the "I don't give a shit hifiguy Jan 2016 #26

Michelle Obama gets slammed by Republicans Staph Jan 2016 #42

This^^^ so true Person 2713 Jan 2016 #102

I'm all for labeling Trump a tacky bastard without slut shaming his wife� MrScorpio Jan 2016 #20

What if he's their candidate in the General? pnwmom Jan 2016 #23

Two wrongs don't make a right� MrScorpio Jan 2016 #28

Id just like these rightwing prudes to go on records as to why they're suddenly so open minded Adenoid_Hynkel Jan 2016 #69

They don't care about a lot of OTHER things about ol' Delirium Tremens over there jmowreader Jan 2016 #24

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #108

Don't care. Oneironaut Jan 2016 #29

LOL! @ Trump didn't get nude (barf!). SammyWinstonJack Jan 2016 #89

As long as Bill Clinton or Michelle Obama are targeted by the right, I say: use the Trump photos. Paladin Jan 2016 #32

Ewww anigbrowl Jan 2016 #73

Yes, once a woman takes off her clothes in front of a camera, she becomes permanently tainted. jeff47 Jan 2016 #33

If Trump is going to call Bill Clinton a rapist, she's fair game as well. PeteSelman Jan 2016 #34

Because taking off your clothes is just like raping someone anigbrowl Jan 2016 #75

I'm saying, do what you have to do. PeteSelman Jan 2016 #114

No you're not. anigbrowl Jan 2016 #116

That's disgusting Kalidurga Jan 2016 #35

So we just keep our mouths shut while Trump and his supporters talk about Bill's bimbo eruptions? pnwmom Jan 2016 #36

Yes Kalidurga Jan 2016 #37

Yeah. Why get down into that gutter? jberryhill Jan 2016 #54

No, you can attack Trump on his own flaws anigbrowl Jan 2016 #80

The Republicans used their response of the State of the union to target Trump to no effect Johonny Jan 2016 #38

Not just internet. January 2000 cover of GQ-British edition. hobbit709 Jan 2016 #40

Nope, most of them masterbate to them book_worm Jan 2016 #43

The women, too? pnwmom Jan 2016 #44

Oh I can't ... Lochloosa Jan 2016 #46

Of course some women are into nude and semi nude women. MerryBlooms Jan 2016 #49

Trump said Hillary was "disgusting" for using the restroom during the debate. pnwmom Jan 2016 #50

It took Donald this many years to find out women use the bathroom? Manifestor_of_Light Jan 2016 #56

I get he's a pitiful excuse for a human, no need to try to convince me... MerryBlooms Jan 2016 #59

"not just an armpiece" Matariki Jan 2016 #47

What kind of dipshit pig talks like that? any republicant saturnsring Jan 2016 #51

Of all the things I could give a shit about, this isn't one of them. nt Joe the Revelator Jan 2016 #48

Bringing her up can only backfire LittleBlue Jan 2016 #57

This is really stupid. dairydog91 Jan 2016 #58

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #60

put them on billboards next to every rightwing megachurch backing him Adenoid_Hynkel Jan 2016 #70

I like the way you think. hifiguy Jan 2016 #71

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #72

If we're told not to care 840high Jan 2016 #61

I can't believe 7 people 840high Jan 2016 #62

They love them. This is the class of people who are his supporters Beaverhausen Jan 2016 #63

Even I don't care about his wife's porn photos anigbrowl Jan 2016 #64

This thread.... aikoaiko Jan 2016 #65

I'm sure if Michelle Obama had posed the same way, the religious right would have been OK with it Adenoid_Hynkel Jan 2016 #66

Shaming Trump's wife for posing nude - how liberal. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #68

Hint: hifiguy Jan 2016 #74

If the Good Lord wanted H2O Man Jan 2016 #78

"Jesus had preached against nudity, in the Bill of Rights" funny stuff panader0 Jan 2016 #83

I believe this is the same crowd that rooted for Palin... Wounded Bear Jan 2016 #79

I cared. A lot. For about 70 seconds. Then I completely stopped caring. AngryAmish Jan 2016 #81

Ted Cruz would be the one who would be most vulnerable to this.... steve2470 Jan 2016 #82

Lewinsky? nt clarice Jan 2016 #84

Who cares Bjornsdotter Jan 2016 #85

The people that support Trump Texasgal Jan 2016 #88

What happens if he is the nominee? Will the religious "nut jobs" vote for him? pnwmom Jan 2016 #94

There's no "this" to ignore melman Jan 2016 #100

That's your opinion.. pnwmom Jan 2016 #101

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #104

I don't think most people know about her background. The media seems to want pnwmom Jan 2016 #105

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #107

He's the guy who said Hillary was disgusting -- DISGUSTING, he repeated -- pnwmom Jan 2016 #109

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #110

I think she IS representative of the religious tea party people, pnwmom Jan 2016 #111

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #112

Close to 100 replies, and no comment on Roger Stone? Bongo Prophet Jan 2016 #91

"She would be the most glamourous first lady since Jackie Kennedy." ecstatic Jan 2016 #92

I guess it's all up for debate Reter Jan 2016 #97

k UTUSN Jan 2016 #93

Trump doesn't get support from the family values wing of the GOP Reter Jan 2016 #95

What happens if he's the nominee? I don't see anyone threatening him at this point. n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #96

I have two Republican friends who both say they won't vote for him if he wins the nomination Reter Jan 2016 #98

Again, there are maybe 20, 30 people tops in the US left who still haven't gotten over porn & nudity Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #99