Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The last thing the NFL in Los Angeles was ever about was the fans [View all]
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2016/jan/13/the-last-thing-the-nfl-in-los-angeles-was-ever-about-was-the-fans"No league in the US uses leverage quite like the NFL. They didnt get to $10bn in revenue by being nice. They have played their broadcast rights brilliantly in recently decades, leading terrified networks to spend outlandish amounts of money out of the fear they might lose their tiny platter of games guaranteed to be ratings winners. But the leagues best trick has been getting cities and counties and states to spend taxpayers money on stadiums to be used for just eight regular-season games.
An LA without football has always been worth more to the league than a LA with a team. As the nations second-largest city sat without a team, every billionaire owner yearning for a new stadium equipped with executive lounges the price of small homes merely had to breathe the words Los Angeles to make local politicians crumble.
LA was the gift that kept on giving to the owners who saw their own franchises jump in value every time another member of the club got their own downtown trophy. Since the Rams and Raiders left LA following the 1994 season, 22 of the leagues 32 teams have built new stadiums or completely overhauled the ones they had. The public contribution to these projects was more than $4.7bn in free money for some of the richest people in the country.
No way does this happen without a vacant Los Angeles. The city was the ballast against desperate politicians who vowed there would be no public funds for local football teams, only to cave when the thought of moving vans at the teams headquarters seemed all too real. The threat of a move to LA lured citizens of other cities to voting booths where they confessed that four months of football Sundays were more important than putting new roofs on schools. They all closed their eyes, held their noses and endorsed checks to some of the wealthiest men in the world to take their taxes and build sports playpens."
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fortunately, they "only" spent 16 million dollars on plans for the "new Stadium".
justhanginon
Jan 2016
#7
I am so against using public money to build or in any way finance private businesses
rurallib
Jan 2016
#6
it's not up the peasants in SoCal or STL if they get a team, it's up to the billionaire owners
pstokely
Jan 2016
#9
They never sell enough tickets here, that's why they keep leaving and coming back.
bemildred
Jan 2016
#13
they've been building new stadiums and arenas with less seats and more corporate suities
pstokely
Jan 2016
#24
No, you can drink beer in a parking lot at soccer games too, I've seen it. nt
bemildred
Jan 2016
#35
they would have become a network sooner if Art Rooney had assumed the Fox viewing position
pstokely
Jan 2016
#26
Professional sports is about entertainment and profit. Not a about sport.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jan 2016
#30