Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

pstokely

(10,891 posts)
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 06:32 AM Jan 2016

The last thing the NFL in Los Angeles was ever about was the fans [View all]

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2016/jan/13/the-last-thing-the-nfl-in-los-angeles-was-ever-about-was-the-fans

"No league in the US uses leverage quite like the NFL. They didn’t get to $10bn in revenue by being nice. They have played their broadcast rights brilliantly in recently decades, leading terrified networks to spend outlandish amounts of money out of the fear they might lose their tiny platter of games guaranteed to be ratings winners. But the league’s best trick has been getting cities and counties and states to spend taxpayers’ money on stadiums to be used for just eight regular-season games.

An LA without football has always been worth more to the league than a LA with a team. As the nation’s second-largest city sat without a team, every billionaire owner yearning for a new stadium equipped with executive lounges the price of small homes merely had to breathe the words “Los Angeles” to make local politicians crumble.

LA was the gift that kept on giving to the owners who saw their own franchises jump in value every time another member of the club got their own downtown trophy. Since the Rams and Raiders left LA following the 1994 season, 22 of the league’s 32 teams have built new stadiums or completely overhauled the ones they had. The public contribution to these projects was more than $4.7bn in free money for some of the richest people in the country.

No way does this happen without a vacant Los Angeles. The city was the ballast against desperate politicians who vowed there would be no public funds for local football teams, only to cave when the thought of moving vans at the team’s headquarters seemed all too real. The threat of a move to LA lured citizens of other cities to voting booths where they confessed that four months of football Sundays were more important than putting new roofs on schools. They all closed their eyes, held their noses and endorsed checks to some of the wealthiest men in the world to take their taxes and build sports playpens."
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Interesting Sherman A1 Jan 2016 #1
Fortunately, they "only" spent 16 million dollars on plans for the "new Stadium". justhanginon Jan 2016 #7
The Padres conned the pols is San Diego Mbrow Jan 2016 #2
Here is an article from a great website that talks about how exboyfil Jan 2016 #3
The Rams can BLOW ME . . . hatrack Jan 2016 #4
And as the article also notes . . . hatrack Jan 2016 #5
I am so against using public money to build or in any way finance private businesses rurallib Jan 2016 #6
Many of us like LA much better without a football team. bemildred Jan 2016 #8
it's not up the peasants in SoCal or STL if they get a team, it's up to the billionaire owners pstokely Jan 2016 #9
It is up to us whether they sell enough tickets. bemildred Jan 2016 #10
They'll sell tickets. There will always be enough people willing to pay.... marmar Jan 2016 #12
They never sell enough tickets here, that's why they keep leaving and coming back. bemildred Jan 2016 #13
they don't need anybody in the seats, just in the corporate suites pstokely Jan 2016 #14
Right. nt bemildred Jan 2016 #16
That's actually true in modern football. Corporate suites generate the bucks. marmar Jan 2016 #18
You would think they would make them with fewer seats. nt bemildred Jan 2016 #19
they've been building new stadiums and arenas with less seats and more corporate suities pstokely Jan 2016 #24
the tv revenue is shared dsc Jan 2016 #31
Even so, their share of the huge tv contract. .... marmar Jan 2016 #36
Watch the Rams like a hawk exboyfil Jan 2016 #11
You forgot Hockey... Xolodno Jan 2016 #20
Yeah, I always forget Hockey. bemildred Jan 2016 #21
I agree PasadenaTrudy Jan 2016 #29
But soccer doesn't have anything like the Super Bowl Blue_Tires Jan 2016 #33
No, you can drink beer in a parking lot at soccer games too, I've seen it. nt bemildred Jan 2016 #35
Fans see better football without a local team. pintobean Jan 2016 #15
I really liked Three Rivers stadium for football. tabasco Jan 2016 #17
college sports has also become a big money game pstokely Jan 2016 #25
True story. tabasco Jan 2016 #27
Kind of want to file this article under..."No shit sherlock" Xolodno Jan 2016 #22
"They have played their broadcast rights brilliantly in recently decades" KamaAina Jan 2016 #23
they would have become a network sooner if Art Rooney had assumed the Fox viewing position pstokely Jan 2016 #26
Why are you all so down on a struggling non-profit like the NFL? gratuitous Jan 2016 #28
London is the new LA for the NFL pstokely Jan 2016 #37
Professional sports is about entertainment and profit. Not a about sport. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #30
The NFL can ram it pintobean Jan 2016 #32
Guradian, stating the obvious as always... Blue_Tires Jan 2016 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The last thing the NFL in...