Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

tblue37

(68,448 posts)

31. That was actually a Monty Python sketch. A man claimed to have 3 butt cheeks, but refused to prove

Reply to juxtaposed (Reply #4)

Fri Jan 15, 2016, 04:45 PM

Jan 2016

it on air after the big announcement, "And now, a man with three butt cheeks!"

The announcer was upset, "Do you expect us to just take your word that you have three butt cheeks?"

Too bad the claimant didn't think to provide a picture like this.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

disturbing optical illusion hits the internet [View all] Liberal_in_LA Jan 2016 OP

spoiler Liberal_in_LA Jan 2016 #1

I definitely had to do a double take on this one. Renew Deal Jan 2016 #13

If he is trying to kiss the baby, then why is he trying to poop on it? AngryAmish Jan 2016 #20

I saw a man kissing his kid. drm604 Jan 2016 #29

I first saw a mass of hairy butt cheeks. Had to read article to see it was a man kissing baby Liberal_in_LA Jan 2016 #33

What's disturbing about a dude kissing his kid? Scootaloo Jan 2016 #2

(SPOILER ALERT) I see it LiberalElite Jan 2016 #3

it's a 3 butt cheek ass juxtaposed Jan 2016 #4

That's what I was trying to figure out 2naSalit Jan 2016 #8

Which means a dual exhaust! Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #22

That was actually a Monty Python sketch. A man claimed to have 3 butt cheeks, but refused to prove tblue37 Jan 2016 #31

I'm not sure why this would cause a big stir. Chemisse Jan 2016 #5

Because internet outrage TransitJohn Jan 2016 #12

I'm not even sure this qualifies as an optical illusion. eom whitefordmd Jan 2016 #6

I got it, but absolutely saw something else at first glance. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #7

I see a shirtless guy kissing a baby. johnp3907 Jan 2016 #9

A giant, malformed, heirloom tomato! immoderate Jan 2016 #10

a heirloom tomato Liberal_in_LA Jan 2016 #11

My first thought was "potato"... baldguy Jan 2016 #15

WHO TH' FUCK LETS BIB FORTUNA NEAR THEIR BABEHS?!? Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #14

I think I am beginning to understand how aome people rurallib Jan 2016 #16

I actually got it right away. Snobblevitch Jan 2016 #17

To be fair, have you inspected the asscheeks of everyone you have met? Thor_MN Jan 2016 #25

No, but I have seen most of their noses. Snobblevitch Jan 2016 #35

If Hieronymus Bosch had been a photographer... petronius Jan 2016 #18

!Bingo!. .very good. . . n/t annabanana Jan 2016 #19

that's one for Awkward Family Photos right there MisterP Jan 2016 #21

It does have a certain Rembrandt/Bosch quality. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #23

It is a bald headed guy kissing his kid...what am I supposed to see? Rex Jan 2016 #24

Potatoes Kalidurga Jan 2016 #26

Those are some hairy potatoes. Rex Jan 2016 #30

I've seen worse Kalidurga Jan 2016 #32

Me too, I still don't see anything 'bad'. Rex Jan 2016 #34

Omg. bunnies Jan 2016 #27

I don't see any optical illusion Sanity Claws Jan 2016 #28

The nose was the giveaway for me. displacedtexan Jan 2016 #36