Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Maybe they interviewed a few of those boys Warpy Jan 2016 #1
bingo.... mike_c Jan 2016 #4
Or something far, far worse that has been going on for quite awhile without accountability bobthedrummer Jan 2016 #30
*THAT* was my first thought Aerows Jan 2016 #32
That could also be the case Warpy Jan 2016 #33
I wonder if he got government subsidies for the ranch as well. rug Jan 2016 #2
“I hope people are seeing the sacrifices we’re making here,” he said. catnhatnh Jan 2016 #3
Lol! grntuscarora Jan 2016 #6
Definitely a WTF moment!! 7wo7rees Jan 2016 #5
I suspect "LaVoy" is taking in those foster children to collect government support payments... 403Forbidden Jan 2016 #7
#DaddySworeAnOath Brickbat Jan 2016 #18
Look up farm subsidies at www.ewg.org/farm Jim Beard Jan 2016 #35
Aw, poor widdle tarp boy lost his free labor and meal ticket. SwankyXomb Jan 2016 #8
Free room and board Old Codger Jan 2016 #9
Does Arizona provide the same amount Downwinder Jan 2016 #10
So he was using kids as cheap labor geomon666 Jan 2016 #11
Eight kids at a time? CA maxed out at placing six in a home *before* they cracked down, LeftyMom Jan 2016 #12
Foster children as income malaise Jan 2016 #13
And likely as unpaid labor, too. suffragette Jan 2016 #24
Well no one can say they aren't getting a real look malaise Jan 2016 #25
Yep, they put the 'ugh' in ugly. suffragette Jan 2016 #34
My friend's mother in law got $5400 a month SoCalDem Jan 2016 #37
Good effin' grief malaise Jan 2016 #38
Hmm. The deal with foster care is you are supposed to be there to take care of the kids...... yellowcanine Jan 2016 #14
I am sure there is a clause in the foster care agreement somewhere.... yellowcanine Jan 2016 #15
Foster children for profit. How caring. Vinca Jan 2016 #16
And it begins... Javaman Jan 2016 #17
Isn't the money for the purpose of taking care of the kids? treestar Jan 2016 #19
"That was my main source of income." Iggo Jan 2016 #20
Why were they removed? Mendocino Jan 2016 #21
The stuff that meets the eye is bad enough. Iggo Jan 2016 #22
I don't think it necessarily means there is more. I am not sure jwirr Jan 2016 #29
Were they removed Mendocino Jan 2016 #31
"That was my main source of income..." joeybee12 Jan 2016 #23
There was a simple way to avoid this situation, LaVoy maxsolomon Jan 2016 #26
I wonder if Runningdawg Jan 2016 #27
If they go on half-rations on the rice and beans Turbineguy Jan 2016 #28
UPDATE: Removal of kids began 4th day of standoff; Finicum blames 'pressure from feds' pinboy3niner Jan 2016 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Foster children removed f...»Reply #16