Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: KRUGMAN: "a simple, straightforward single-payer system just isn’t going to happen" [View all]Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)28. exactly.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
145 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
KRUGMAN: "a simple, straightforward single-payer system just isn’t going to happen" [View all]
kpete
Jan 2016
OP
I understand his point, but he was being far more pessimistic than I expected
Fast Walker 52
Jan 2016
#1
And when Hillary Care was defeated, it was almost 20 years before anyone would touch it.
Hoyt
Jan 2016
#44
It put control at the local level. Medicare actually isn't that simple because most folks don't get
Hoyt
Jan 2016
#70
If you can get it passed, which is what Clinton and Krugman are saying -- you can't short-term.
Hoyt
Jan 2016
#102
That is exactly how you get change in a Democracy. You rarely have the opportunity to do it any
stevenleser
Jan 2016
#31
That is somewhat a simplification. A lot of negotiation goes on in the background.
Hoyt
Jan 2016
#95
And that is the same line of bullshit the 'civil unions are all that is possible' bigots pushed
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#69
" the way things are serve them just fine". Or they haven't been burned (yet) by the way things are
antigop
Jan 2016
#77
i'm glad it's being debated in pres primary. we need to have this debate again and again...
tk2kewl
Jan 2016
#35
So that means we can hold Sanders responsible for his gun positions in 2008
stevenleser
Jan 2016
#74
Yeah, I know, whether someone can actually do what they promise is a silly thing to consider.
stevenleser
Jan 2016
#144
To say that it is an absolute disaster for millions is the same as saying you are against it.
Squinch
Jan 2016
#17
Which is how we got the ACA passed. Next step — public option, then single-payer.
brush
Jan 2016
#108
Krugman is being pragmatic and wants to fix things and get things done-like Hillary.
riversedge
Jan 2016
#10
I don't think he's being honest about the issue as a whole, including his description of the past.
merrily
Jan 2016
#22
Not until the redistricting issue is solved. Which would require massive state level Democratic
stevenleser
Jan 2016
#12
I fully expect a President Sanders to spend the first 2 years of his first term
Volaris
Jan 2016
#18
We were assured that ACA was not going to be the be all and end all, only the beginning.
merrily
Jan 2016
#25
Talk about dishonest (your words upthread). Single Payer isn't going further on the ACA
KittyWampus
Jan 2016
#56
Talk about dishonest (your words in Reply 56). My post upthread never said anything about
merrily
Jan 2016
#60
Being something that 50% of the populace won't vote for excludes you from being that
stevenleser
Jan 2016
#61
Because I agree with Krugman likely means, once again, I'm not a real liberal
Blue_Adept
Jan 2016
#26
Bernie made the point last night, none of this will change unless we change campaign finance laws.
leftupnorth
Jan 2016
#32
Obamacare worked for the very poor and for the very rich (insurance companies)
Doctor_J
Jan 2016
#37
Ask yourself whether we get more and better Democrats with Hillary or Bernie as President.
stillwaiting
Jan 2016
#97
I think he is just looking at the handwriting on the wall and saying he thinks this is the
CTyankee
Jan 2016
#118
this is the sort of truth that makes me want to leave this dump of a country forever.
librechik
Jan 2016
#71
no answer? And we could be as functional here in the US if it weren't for hate.
librechik
Jan 2016
#96
His statement of the goal is incorrect. The goal is access to healthcare, not health insurance.
xocet
Jan 2016
#100
The way to get the public option, is to demand something even less palatable to TPTB. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Jan 2016
#119
That is the kind of hopelessness and capitulation to power we have already overdosed on.
Todays_Illusion
Jan 2016
#134