Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

librechik

(30,957 posts)
71. this is the sort of truth that makes me want to leave this dump of a country forever.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:05 PM
Jan 2016

I'm so tired of living in this phony amusement park Frontierland. Can we ever grow up and join the rest of the world in the present era??

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I understand his point, but he was being far more pessimistic than I expected Fast Walker 52 Jan 2016 #1
Because Krugman is reality based and reality is on Hillary's side. nt stevenleser Jan 2016 #6
Exactly. And he's right on this issue, as is Clinton. Hoyt Jan 2016 #20
Talking about kludgey 1939 Jan 2016 #41
And when Hillary Care was defeated, it was almost 20 years before anyone would touch it. Hoyt Jan 2016 #44
Because it was a complicated bureaucratic nightmare 1939 Jan 2016 #65
It put control at the local level. Medicare actually isn't that simple because most folks don't get Hoyt Jan 2016 #70
Right to a point 1939 Jan 2016 #140
Exactly one reason I think Medicare for all will be quite expensive. Hoyt Jan 2016 #141
Medicare didn't spring full blown into the program it is today -- which still pnwmom Jan 2016 #137
They are completely wrong. alarimer Jan 2016 #99
If you can get it passed, which is what Clinton and Krugman are saying -- you can't short-term. Hoyt Jan 2016 #102
sorry, you don't get change by pushing for incremental improvements Fast Walker 52 Jan 2016 #27
That is exactly how you get change in a Democracy. You rarely have the opportunity to do it any stevenleser Jan 2016 #31
Wrong Perogie Jan 2016 #39
Read about how the Social Security program evolved with incremental changes. Hoyt Jan 2016 #50
from a strict point of negotiating though, you start with a big goal Fast Walker 52 Jan 2016 #94
That is somewhat a simplification. A lot of negotiation goes on in the background. Hoyt Jan 2016 #95
And that is the same line of bullshit the 'civil unions are all that is possible' bigots pushed Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #69
" the way things are serve them just fine". Or they haven't been burned (yet) by the way things are antigop Jan 2016 #77
Except it did take years and decades for same sex marriage mythology Jan 2016 #115
Tell that to the anti-smoking crowd. JohnnyRingo Jan 2016 #59
i'm glad it's being debated in pres primary. we need to have this debate again and again... tk2kewl Jan 2016 #35
Says the person who had THIS to say in 2008: ljm2002 Jan 2016 #68
So that means we can hold Sanders responsible for his gun positions in 2008 stevenleser Jan 2016 #74
Nice try, no cigar... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #78
That poster is always more harsh than necessary, it's part of his schtick Fumesucker Jan 2016 #139
Except, you leave out the part JesterCS Jan 2016 #138
I agree with his assessment of the political realities. ronnie624 Jan 2016 #79
You're arguments are so silly WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jan 2016 #142
Yeah, I know, whether someone can actually do what they promise is a silly thing to consider. stevenleser Jan 2016 #144
I just explained it all to you WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jan 2016 #145
SO. we try. pangaia Jan 2016 #2
How is that? Squinch Jan 2016 #8
Don't get me wrong, I am not against it. pangaia Jan 2016 #14
To say that it is an absolute disaster for millions is the same as saying you are against it. Squinch Jan 2016 #17
not a disaster kpete Jan 2016 #33
I've seen many of those too. Squinch Jan 2016 #36
Perhaps I exagerated. pangaia Jan 2016 #66
Everyone has a tendency to do that. maxsolomon Jan 2016 #113
Agreed. Obama never wanted a Public Option WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jan 2016 #40
Too hard! tazkcmo Jan 2016 #3
exactly. Fast Walker 52 Jan 2016 #28
+1000000 SammyWinstonJack Jan 2016 #86
Which is how we got the ACA passed. Next step — public option, then single-payer. brush Jan 2016 #108
I'm ok with that tazkcmo Jan 2016 #120
Agreed. Single payer has to be the final goal brush Jan 2016 #124
Thanks, third way. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #4
Krugman is not being honest. Either that, or he's being incredibly naive. merrily Jan 2016 #5
Krugman is being pragmatic and wants to fix things and get things done-like Hillary. riversedge Jan 2016 #10
I find the article completely honest TeddyR Jan 2016 #11
There was zero chance Alexander could defeat Napoleon, also. pangaia Jan 2016 #19
That's a trite response Cosmocat Jan 2016 #88
I see. pangaia Jan 2016 #89
He didn't have a majority of the House and Senate TeddyR Jan 2016 #110
That is absolutely true. pangaia Jan 2016 #112
I don't think he's being honest about the issue as a whole, including his description of the past. merrily Jan 2016 #22
If the dems could finally get a mid-term right - that would be a game changer lame54 Jan 2016 #7
Not until the redistricting issue is solved. Which would require massive state level Democratic stevenleser Jan 2016 #12
I hear you-- we don't have much chance until the new census Fast Walker 52 Jan 2016 #29
I fully expect a President Sanders to spend the first 2 years of his first term Volaris Jan 2016 #18
That is exactly what he did as mayor of Burlington, I am learning. pangaia Jan 2016 #23
The House is gerrymandered to Republicans JohnnyRingo Jan 2016 #64
So never try and you'll get it one day? mmonk Jan 2016 #9
We were assured that ACA was not going to be the be all and end all, only the beginning. merrily Jan 2016 #25
exactly. Fast Walker 52 Jan 2016 #30
Talk about dishonest (your words upthread). Single Payer isn't going further on the ACA KittyWampus Jan 2016 #56
Talk about dishonest (your words in Reply 56). My post upthread never said anything about merrily Jan 2016 #60
If the Democrats have a candidate who's diminishing the accomplishments of ACA pnwmom Jan 2016 #117
This is massive bullshit. stillwaiting Jan 2016 #13
Nope, you cannot have it until January 2023 at the earliest. stevenleser Jan 2016 #15
If only we had a candidate that could energize more people to the polls Perogie Jan 2016 #42
Being something that 50% of the populace won't vote for excludes you from being that stevenleser Jan 2016 #61
You're right Perogie Jan 2016 #132
This is the correct answer madville Jan 2016 #49
This is why midterms are so important. Beartracks Jan 2016 #129
Of course but this is a marathon, not a sprint Quixote1818 Jan 2016 #103
This message was self-deleted by its author LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #16
Not really 1939 Jan 2016 #46
Never underestimate the value of a deductible expense R.A. Ganoush Jan 2016 #55
Surrender to the kleptocracy. All resistance is futile. Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #21
It's as if you don't realize there are other options. KittyWampus Jan 2016 #57
There is one sure way to stay with the status quo. onecaliberal Jan 2016 #24
Because I agree with Krugman likely means, once again, I'm not a real liberal Blue_Adept Jan 2016 #26
Bernie made the point last night, none of this will change unless we change campaign finance laws. leftupnorth Jan 2016 #32
Incrementalism. HughBeaumont Jan 2016 #34
Obamacare worked for the very poor and for the very rich (insurance companies) Doctor_J Jan 2016 #37
let's not try to change anything at all because sometimes we might fail Perogie Jan 2016 #38
It's not realistic to expect either candidate to get anything WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jan 2016 #43
Supreme Court nominations madville Jan 2016 #58
I covered that here WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jan 2016 #81
Krugman's right lanlady Jan 2016 #45
If you had asked most pundits a year ago... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #75
Ask yourself whether we get more and better Democrats with Hillary or Bernie as President. stillwaiting Jan 2016 #97
Well just have to leave Krug man behind Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2016 #47
Gladly Proserpina Jan 2016 #63
I think he is just looking at the handwriting on the wall and saying he thinks this is the CTyankee Jan 2016 #118
If Bernie can't get universal care kcjohn1 Jan 2016 #48
I think a President Bernie 1939 Jan 2016 #51
a bridge too far dembotoz Jan 2016 #52
People forget that Obamacare began as single payer. JohnnyRingo Jan 2016 #53
Bernie is promising to work with us. That's what he's promising. stillwaiting Jan 2016 #98
Well good luck then JohnnyRingo Jan 2016 #114
What was it RFK said? mikehiggins Jan 2016 #54
Krugman is handing out 10 lbs of BS in a 2 lb Sack Proserpina Jan 2016 #62
Well Mr. Krugman olddots Jan 2016 #67
this is the sort of truth that makes me want to leave this dump of a country forever. librechik Jan 2016 #71
You think it's all puppy dogs and rainbows somewhere else? stevenleser Jan 2016 #82
When I first visited my son in AU he handed me his Medicare card and said: librechik Jan 2016 #85
no answer? And we could be as functional here in the US if it weren't for hate. librechik Jan 2016 #96
People who say "it can't be done" need to shut up and go away. Avalux Jan 2016 #72
Thanks for your input Paul. elias49 Jan 2016 #73
First we need public option. Then WDIM Jan 2016 #76
Uh-oh, time for the hatred of Paul to begin... joeybee12 Jan 2016 #80
In other words, decide you are going to lose before negotiations even begin, Zorra Jan 2016 #83
Again with the fear meme Orrex Jan 2016 #92
Single-payer will never happen Matrosov Jan 2016 #84
When Krugman agrees with Sanders, he's a genius Orrex Jan 2016 #87
I think our best hope would be to get a public option - Vinca Jan 2016 #90
As I've Read & Listened To Krugman For Many Years... ChiciB1 Jan 2016 #91
Mostly status quo now. ozone_man Jan 2016 #93
I Suppose You Could Put It Another Way... ChiciB1 Jan 2016 #106
His statement of the goal is incorrect. The goal is access to healthcare, not health insurance. xocet Jan 2016 #100
Krugman has always portrayed himself as an FDR Democrat. jwirr Jan 2016 #101
Yes, that kind of thing is for other countries. moondust Jan 2016 #104
It's like none of these people have any idea what "Progressive" means. kjones Jan 2016 #105
So, what is Krugman saying, really? Baitball Blogger Jan 2016 #107
Krugman's been pretty incoherent on this issue for a while Chathamization Jan 2016 #109
When I looked at the article on the NY Times website... Lydia Leftcoast Jan 2016 #111
Try again. You missed them. Bottom, right hand side. n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #116
They were invisible on my phone, but I saw them when I Lydia Leftcoast Jan 2016 #123
The way to get the public option, is to demand something even less palatable to TPTB. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jan 2016 #119
we will never go to the moon SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #121
Krugman, the voice of reason. Beacool Jan 2016 #122
Hey, Kroog. We've all seen the ACA. I think we get that. Orsino Jan 2016 #125
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Jan 2016 #126
We will have single-payer when our population is more manageable. randome Jan 2016 #127
He's not reading. zipplewrath Jan 2016 #128
This much is certain: as long as Democratic Eeyores say "no we can't" Maedhros Jan 2016 #130
Here’s One Big Problem With The Bernie Sanders Plan For Health Care Utopia Gothmog Jan 2016 #131
Krugman has already chosen his side. What a sellout AZ Progressive Jan 2016 #133
That is the kind of hopelessness and capitulation to power we have already overdosed on. Todays_Illusion Jan 2016 #134
We have to try Marrah_G Jan 2016 #135
Yes, thank you Marrah_G Todays_Illusion Jan 2016 #136
How about Medicare for All? jpak Jan 2016 #143
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»KRUGMAN: "a simple, ...»Reply #71