Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

jwirr

(39,215 posts)

29. I don't think it necessarily means there is more. I am not sure

Reply to Mendocino (Reply #21)

Mon Jan 18, 2016, 04:34 PM

Jan 2016

about the state he lives in but most states do not place their children in the homes of criminals. His actions are the reason these children were taken out of his care.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Foster children removed from home of Oregon militia militant [View all] KamaAina Jan 2016 OP

Maybe they interviewed a few of those boys Warpy Jan 2016 #1

bingo.... mike_c Jan 2016 #4

Or something far, far worse that has been going on for quite awhile without accountability bobthedrummer Jan 2016 #30

*THAT* was my first thought Aerows Jan 2016 #32

That could also be the case Warpy Jan 2016 #33

I wonder if he got government subsidies for the ranch as well. rug Jan 2016 #2

�I hope people are seeing the sacrifices we�re making here,� he said. catnhatnh Jan 2016 #3

Lol! grntuscarora Jan 2016 #6

Definitely a WTF moment!! 7wo7rees Jan 2016 #5

I suspect "LaVoy" is taking in those foster children to collect government support payments... 403Forbidden Jan 2016 #7

#DaddySworeAnOath Brickbat Jan 2016 #18

Look up farm subsidies at www.ewg.org/farm Jim Beard Jan 2016 #35

Aw, poor widdle tarp boy lost his free labor and meal ticket. SwankyXomb Jan 2016 #8

Free room and board Old Codger Jan 2016 #9

Does Arizona provide the same amount Downwinder Jan 2016 #10

So he was using kids as cheap labor geomon666 Jan 2016 #11

Eight kids at a time? CA maxed out at placing six in a home *before* they cracked down, LeftyMom Jan 2016 #12

Foster children as income malaise Jan 2016 #13

And likely as unpaid labor, too. suffragette Jan 2016 #24

Well no one can say they aren't getting a real look malaise Jan 2016 #25

Yep, they put the 'ugh' in ugly. suffragette Jan 2016 #34

My friend's mother in law got $5400 a month SoCalDem Jan 2016 #37

Good effin' grief malaise Jan 2016 #38

Hmm. The deal with foster care is you are supposed to be there to take care of the kids...... yellowcanine Jan 2016 #14

I am sure there is a clause in the foster care agreement somewhere.... yellowcanine Jan 2016 #15

Foster children for profit. How caring. Vinca Jan 2016 #16

And it begins... Javaman Jan 2016 #17

Isn't the money for the purpose of taking care of the kids? treestar Jan 2016 #19

"That was my main source of income." Iggo Jan 2016 #20

Why were they removed? Mendocino Jan 2016 #21

The stuff that meets the eye is bad enough. Iggo Jan 2016 #22

I don't think it necessarily means there is more. I am not sure jwirr Jan 2016 #29

Were they removed Mendocino Jan 2016 #31

"That was my main source of income..." joeybee12 Jan 2016 #23

There was a simple way to avoid this situation, LaVoy maxsolomon Jan 2016 #26

I wonder if Runningdawg Jan 2016 #27

If they go on half-rations on the rice and beans Turbineguy Jan 2016 #28

UPDATE: Removal of kids began 4th day of standoff; Finicum blames 'pressure from feds' pinboy3niner Jan 2016 #36