Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(14,947 posts)

1. He doesn't have a uterus.

Sat Jan 23, 2016, 08:51 AM

Jan 2016

He isn't an obstetrician or a gynecologist.

He shouldn't be legislating anything pertaining to females.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Anti-Abortion Ads That Make the Rude Pundit Want to Stab His Computer Screen [View all] eridani Jan 2016 OP

He doesn't have a uterus. SamKnause Jan 2016 #1

If that were true then we should have at least two sets of legislators Major Nikon Jan 2016 #2

Fuck Rubio. smirkymonkey Jan 2016 #3

You win the interwebs!! n/t eridani Jan 2016 #4

!! BlueJazz Jan 2016 #5

I've been wondering where meegbear has gone, too. countryjake Jan 2016 #6

I'll be a stand-in until s/he comes back n/t eridani Jan 2016 #9

If men were the ones who got pregnant Jenny_92808 Jan 2016 #7

Or, as Gloria Steinem once said, IIRC, hifiguy Jan 2016 #8