Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
35. I will note that Clinton's plan does not address your issues either...
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 11:25 AM
Jan 2016

...i.e. it talks about debt free college, with tuition free community colleges, but it fails to address anything about continuing education or people who might want to go back to college.

So here are your 2 questions:

If I want to finish my BA after I retire, will that be free? Can my son who dropped out 3 years ago, go back free? Just trying to understand the parameters as the answers to these questions do impact costs.


My understanding is that both you and your son would go through the normal admissions process, and once accepted into (or back into) the program, then yes, assuming you are going to a public college or university, you will be attending tuition-free, plus you will be able to avail yourself of low interest loans if necessary, apply for grants, etc.

Neither plan (Clinton or Sanders) says anything about continuing education classes. Many colleges and universities offer classes that people take individually, not as part of a degree program, and typically the people pay to take those classes. I don't know if those would also be mandated to be free of charge, and I don't know if they should be. I think the thrust of both plans is for people who are getting degrees, and are being saddled with huge debt, sometimes with high interest, and not dischargeable through bankruptcy either. Both Clinton and Sanders recognize that making higher education more attainable serves the larger social good and are trying to make improvements in this area.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I suspect it is BECAUSE it was accessible and affordable for all in the 60s PatrickforO Jan 2016 #1
That's a big part of it. And the worst thing is, our party's leaders have largely accepted the idea Ken Burch Jan 2016 #5
Yes. tecelote Jan 2016 #7
This^^^ ypsfonos Jan 2016 #32
What's your experience with colleges today? alcibiades_mystery Jan 2016 #2
I do not believe a college education should be 'free'. Snobblevitch Jan 2016 #3
Is there really anything we need to invest in.... daleanime Jan 2016 #27
that would be a pretty different kind of university 6chars Jan 2016 #4
Education should be free Truprogressive85 Jan 2016 #6
Education IS free. HughBeaumont Jan 2016 #16
or think that while our high schools are as totally unequal as they currently are dsc Jan 2016 #20
Totally. Dumbest policy making people pay to get educated. nt bemildred Jan 2016 #8
I don't think that free public college is something I am against but it sounds more like a slogan seaglass Jan 2016 #9
Looks like a plan to me: ljm2002 Jan 2016 #11
Who is eligible? Is this the College for All Act - 67% of cost paid by Fed and 33% seaglass Jan 2016 #12
Everyone who qualifies is eligible... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #13
Are you stating a fact or making an assumption? If I want to take college courses for seaglass Jan 2016 #15
Let's see now... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #18
Did you notice that you didn't answer any of my questions? They are all real questions. I would be seaglass Jan 2016 #22
I don't need to answer your questions... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #24
Asking for details = shifting the debate. OK. I'm not really interested in either cut and paste seaglass Jan 2016 #34
I will note that Clinton's plan does not address your issues either... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #35
which means this is an entitlement for middle class and wealthy dsc Jan 2016 #21
Looks to me like it applies to a lot of people... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #23
and Bernie's plan would do next to nothing about your second blue box dsc Jan 2016 #25
His plan would help there also... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #31
The Univ of CA nominally had "free tuition" but in the 60's it was actually about LuckyLib Jan 2016 #46
So folks who don't go to college have stunted souls. AngryAmish Jan 2016 #10
I wasn't attacking people who don't go to college by choice and you know it. Ken Burch Jan 2016 #14
"exposure to real ideas, real discussion, a chance to stretch their minds to the fullest" FLPanhandle Jan 2016 #29
Those degrees do involve effort. Ken Burch Jan 2016 #36
I agree with the goal of free higher education FLPanhandle Jan 2016 #37
I'll have another look at the wording earlier. Ken Burch Jan 2016 #42
I received a substandard liberal arts education in the 80s AngryAmish Jan 2016 #30
I'm all for making public universities and colleges tuition free, BUT cali Jan 2016 #17
I didn't say everyone should be forced to go to college. Ken Burch Jan 2016 #19
I'm more of a technical person madville Jan 2016 #39
I know quite a few very sharp people like you. cali Jan 2016 #41
You can MOOC any Harvard or MIT or UC course for free Recursion Jan 2016 #26
Education has never been more accessible. FLPanhandle Jan 2016 #28
More people are getting Bachelor degrees than ever madville Jan 2016 #40
K&R smirkymonkey Jan 2016 #33
I don't think it should be free. lumberjack_jeff Jan 2016 #38
There are side effects to consider madville Jan 2016 #43
A degree carried more weight? Ask the millions of young women who graduated in the LuckyLib Jan 2016 #47
Excellent point madville Jan 2016 #49
The STEM circle jerk and the shaming of the Humanities... Odin2005 Jan 2016 #44
Bullshit FLPanhandle Jan 2016 #45
Speaking from the perspective of a humanities professor... a la izquierda Jan 2016 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We should ALL support fre...»Reply #35