Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We should ALL support free college, because a college education should be an EDUCATION. [View all]ljm2002
(10,751 posts)35. I will note that Clinton's plan does not address your issues either...
...i.e. it talks about debt free college, with tuition free community colleges, but it fails to address anything about continuing education or people who might want to go back to college.
So here are your 2 questions:
If I want to finish my BA after I retire, will that be free? Can my son who dropped out 3 years ago, go back free? Just trying to understand the parameters as the answers to these questions do impact costs.
My understanding is that both you and your son would go through the normal admissions process, and once accepted into (or back into) the program, then yes, assuming you are going to a public college or university, you will be attending tuition-free, plus you will be able to avail yourself of low interest loans if necessary, apply for grants, etc.
Neither plan (Clinton or Sanders) says anything about continuing education classes. Many colleges and universities offer classes that people take individually, not as part of a degree program, and typically the people pay to take those classes. I don't know if those would also be mandated to be free of charge, and I don't know if they should be. I think the thrust of both plans is for people who are getting degrees, and are being saddled with huge debt, sometimes with high interest, and not dischargeable through bankruptcy either. Both Clinton and Sanders recognize that making higher education more attainable serves the larger social good and are trying to make improvements in this area.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
We should ALL support free college, because a college education should be an EDUCATION. [View all]
Ken Burch
Jan 2016
OP
That's a big part of it. And the worst thing is, our party's leaders have largely accepted the idea
Ken Burch
Jan 2016
#5
I don't think that free public college is something I am against but it sounds more like a slogan
seaglass
Jan 2016
#9
Who is eligible? Is this the College for All Act - 67% of cost paid by Fed and 33%
seaglass
Jan 2016
#12
Are you stating a fact or making an assumption? If I want to take college courses for
seaglass
Jan 2016
#15
Did you notice that you didn't answer any of my questions? They are all real questions. I would be
seaglass
Jan 2016
#22
Asking for details = shifting the debate. OK. I'm not really interested in either cut and paste
seaglass
Jan 2016
#34
The Univ of CA nominally had "free tuition" but in the 60's it was actually about
LuckyLib
Jan 2016
#46
"exposure to real ideas, real discussion, a chance to stretch their minds to the fullest"
FLPanhandle
Jan 2016
#29
A degree carried more weight? Ask the millions of young women who graduated in the
LuckyLib
Jan 2016
#47