Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Question , Who do you suppose is making the final decision on dealing Bundy & squatters in Oregon? [View all]99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)52. I support much of what Obama has done, but on this one, not so much.
Cool Heads don't ignore a seditious, white-supremacist armed insurrection to run rough-shod
over the rights of my fellow citizens in Burns OR to not be harassed and intimidated by armed
thugs, or the rights of Native Americans to not have their sacred land full of artifacts bulldozed
and desecrated, or the rights of Federal employees to not have their security badges illegally
used to invade their privacy, including SS numbers, credit card into, etc.. And this is just a
few of the reasons Oregon's Gov. Kate Brown has openly raised the question as to why this
gang of armed thugs are so 'special' that the FBI is treating them with kid-gloves and allowing
them to break the law with impunity, for nearly a month now.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Question , Who do you suppose is making the final decision on dealing Bundy & squatters in Oregon? [View all]
Stuart G
Jan 2016
OP
it can't be the bginning because there have been so many similar occupations in the past.
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#15
He probably has the ultimate word, but just delegates his situation managers in the FBI to deal with
world wide wally
Jan 2016
#2
They are doing infograthering all the time. Probably have an undercover person
Jim Beard
Jan 2016
#3
I'm so tired of hearing of the standoff described this way: either violent action or
99th_Monkey
Jan 2016
#4
I think to a bigger extent than we perhaps realize law enforcement sympathizes with the militias
Fumesucker
Jan 2016
#5
As a person who worked with many LEOs, I can attest to the truth of this. It's the job
Nay
Jan 2016
#30
I trust that you're not conflating my post w/ 'authoritarianism' or summary execution of Bundy jerks
99th_Monkey
Jan 2016
#63
Can you cite laws which allow the seizing of accounts of those who have not even been arrested?
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#14
Arrested people with evidence collected and when that is abused good people oppose it and do not
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#19
Look at the War on Drugs. Law enforcement seizes money from people all the time, without charges.
backscatter712
Jan 2016
#61
Cut off food, for sure. Water's on-site, but if they can cut off power...
Lizzie Poppet
Jan 2016
#23
If anybody at all has made a decision (an open question), it was the wrong one.
Paladin
Jan 2016
#22
I think he's being proved right as long as other incidents don't start up elsewhere
flamingdem
Jan 2016
#37
Actually, "other incidents" are now being planned, incited & actively organized
99th_Monkey
Jan 2016
#45
IMO it's with President Obama. Also, I bet there is a lot of discussion on how actions might
RKP5637
Jan 2016
#27
Good point. Could be an endless talking point if anyone is killed or injured.
flamingdem
Jan 2016
#38